Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Capital Gain - Exemption u/s 54 and Deposition in capital gain scheme account

CA Neil Ganatra
Section 54(2) Capital Gain Exemption: Gauhati High Court Allows Extended Use of Gains Under Section 139(4) Timeframe Section 54(2) of the Income Tax Act allows capital gain exemptions if the gain is reinvested in a new asset or deposited in a capital gain scheme account. Disputes arise over whether deposits must be made within the Section 139(1) deadline. Courts have varied in their rulings, with some allowing exemptions if the gain is utilized within the broader Section 139 timeframe, including Section 139(4), which allows for belated returns. The Gauhati High Court ruled that Section 139 includes all subsections, allowing exemptions if gains are used within the extended timeframe, even without timely deposits. However, deposits must adhere to Section 139(1) deadlines if not utilized. (AI Summary)

Capital Gain Exemption & Capital Gain Account Scheme

Sec. 54 (2) of the Income Tax Act provides as under:

“The amount of the capital gain which is not appropriated by the assessee towards the purchase of the new asset made within one year before the date on which the transfer of the original asset took place, or which is not utilized by him for the purchase or construction of the new asset before the date of furnishing the return of income under section 139, shall be deposited by him before furnishing such return [such deposit being made in any case not later than the due date applicable in the case of the assessee for furnishing the return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139] in an account in any such bank or institution as may be specified in, and utilized in accordance with, any scheme30 which the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, frame in this behalf and such return shall be accompanied by proof of such deposit; and, for the purposes of sub-section (1), the amount, if any, already utilized by the assessee for the purchase or construction of the new asset together with the amount so deposited shall be deemed to be the cost of the new asset”

Herein the section mentions that if the amount invested in the new asset is less than the capital gain amount then the remaining amount should be deposited in the capital gain scheme account. Now the points of disputes are;

  1. To claim exemption, is it necessary to deposit the remaining amount in capital gain account within time limit prescribed u/s 139(1)?
  2. Whether exemption is available to an assessee, if he fails to deposit the amount in capital gain account within prescribe time limit, however, deposits the entire amount after the prescribe time limit?
  3. Is it possible to claim exemption u/s 54 though the whole capital gain amount was neither invested nor deposited in capital gain account but was utilized later?

There are judgments wherein Similar questions were observed by Hon’ble Gauhati High Court (in CIT v. Rajesh Kumar Jalan 2006 (8) TMI 126 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT) and ITAT Bangalore (in Shri Nipun Mehrotra v. ACIT (2007 (3) TMI 283 - ITAT BANGALORE-B)), favored the assessee and allowed the exemption wherein the amount was not deposited in capital gain account within the prescribed time limit. However, in similar situation, Hon’ble ITAT Delhi (in Taran Birsingh Sahni (2005 (9) TMI 508 - ITAT DELHI)) took the contrarily view and disallowed the claim of the assessee.

One point to notice in in all the above cases was, the assessee invested the money in new house property within the one year before or two years after the transfer and he failed to deposit the amount in capital gain account, i.e. the whole capital gain amount was not invested before the due date of filing return of income u/s 139(1). 

The Hon’ble Gauhati High court took the view that the section mentioned in the section 54(2) above refers time limit of section 139 and not the 139(1) alone. Section 139 includes section 139(4) wherein time limit for filing belated return is one year from the end of assessment year or completion of assessment whichever is earlier. The court also referred the judgements of State of Maharashtra v. Santosh Shankar Acharya 2000 (8) TMI 1059 - SUPREME COURT and Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill P. Ltd. 2002 (12) TMI 563 - SUPREME COURTto discuss the well-known principal of construction of statutes that the Legislature engrafted every part of the statute for a purpose. The legislative intention is that every part of the statute should be given effect. The Legislature is deemed not to waste its words or to say anything in vain and a construction which attributes redundancy to the Legislature will not be accepted except for compelling reasons.

Therefore, 54(2) – Capital Gain Account Scheme can be interpreted as under, to avail exemption;

- If the full amount of the capital gain is invested in new residential house property within the time limit u/s 139(1)

- Full amount of capital gain is not invested within time limit u/s 139(1), but it is utilized within the time limit u/s 139(4) though nothing is deposited in the capital gain account within time limit u/s 139(1).

In section 54(2) two sections are mentioned viz. 139 and 139(1). It must be understood that there are two different sentences in which both these sections are referred. In the first sentence with reference to utilization of the amount section 139 is mentioned without mentioning any sub section. While in the second sentence with reference to deposition of amount in capital gain account, section 139(1) is specifically mentioned. Which means though nothing in deposited in capital gain account, exemption u/s 54 can be availed if the full amount of capital gain is utilized within time limit u/s 139(4) as section 139 mentioned in the act for that purpose includes all subsections. However, if the amount is not actually utilized within the time limit, exemption can’t be claimed by depositing the amount after due date mentioned u/s 139(1). If the assessee wants to deposit the amount in capital gain account, the deposition has to be within the time limit mentioned u/s 139(1).

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles