Just a moment...

Top
Help
The Most Awaited - AI Search is Live! 🚀

AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.

Launch AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Additional Depreciation Allowed without Revised Return

LALIT MUNOYAT
Additional depreciation and appellate claims may be admitted despite no revised return where procedural limits cannot defeat substantive tax entitlement. Maintainability of a revenue appeal depends on the correct tax effect arising from the actual dispute, and not on erroneous or inflated figures in the appeal papers; if the properly computed tax effect is below the CBDT monetary limit, the appeal is liable to be dismissed in limine. Although the Assessing Officer cannot entertain a fresh claim except through a revised return, appellate authorities may admit and decide such claims to determine the correct taxable income, including correction of depreciation due to an opening written down value error and supported additional depreciation. (AI Summary)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Thane Versus MM Plastoware India Private Limited And (Vice-Versa) - 2025 (3) TMI 1625 - ITAT MUMBAI

The Tribunal held that the maintainability of the Revenue's appeal is to be examined with reference to the correct tax effect arising from the actual disputed issues, and not on the basis of any erroneous or inflated figures mentioned in Form No. 36, and where such correctly computed tax effect falls below the monetary limit prescribed under the binding CBDT Circulars, the appeal is liable to be dismissed in limine. On the substantive issue, it was observed that while the Assessing Officer, in view of the decision in Goetze (India) Limited Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax - 2006 (3) TMI 75 - Supreme Court, is constrained from entertaining a fresh claim otherwise than by way of a revised return, such embargo does not extend to the appellate authorities, who are competent to admit and adjudicate claims, including those not made in the return, with a view to determining the correct taxable income. Accordingly, the action of the CIT(A) in granting relief by allowing the assessee's claim for correction of depreciation arising from a computational error in the opening WDV, as well as the claim of additional depreciation duly supported by material on record, was upheld, it being a settled position that procedural requirements cannot defeat substantive rights, particularly where the claim represents a correction of an existing allowance rather than a wholly new claim.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles