TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Impact of Minimum Import Price (MIP) on Make in India: A Critical Analysis.
Here is a detailed critical analysis of how the Minimum Import Price (MIP) mechanism, when implemented by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), can support the Make in India initiative:
1. Introduction
The Minimum Import Price (MIP) is a trade policy tool used by the DGFT under the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) of India. It sets a floor price below which imports of specified goods are not permitted. By disincentivizing the inflow of cheap foreign goods, MIP aims to protect domestic industries from unfair pricing and dumping.
In the context of the Make in India scheme—which promotes indigenous manufacturing, self-reliance, and job creation—MIP is often considered a strategic tool. However, it also raises questions of trade fairness, consumer impact, and WTO compliance.
2. Objective of MIP in India
The key objectives behind implementing MIP are:
- To protect domestic manufacturers from predatory pricing or dumping by foreign players.
- To create a level playing field for Indian manufacturers by reducing price-based unfair competition.
- To encourage capacity utilization and investments in Indian manufacturing.
- To align with the Aatmanirbhar Bharat and Make in India goals.
3. How MIP Supports Make in India – Analytical View
3.1 Protection Against Dumping and Cheap Imports
- MIP prevents the undercutting of Indian producers by cheaper imports, especially from countries with surplus production (e.g., China).
- This allows Indian manufacturers to stabilize prices and gain market share, incentivizing them to scale operations.
? Positive Impact: Protects sunrise sectors like steel, electronics, solar modules, and MSMEs from import-driven price volatility.
3.2 Encouragement of Domestic Manufacturing
- When imports become less competitive, domestic firms find an economic incentive to manufacture locally.
- This encourages investment in infrastructure, R&D, and human capital to meet domestic demand and export targets.
? Positive Impact: MIP has shown short-term boosts in domestic production in sectors like steel, aluminum, and electronic components.
3.3 Improvement in Capacity Utilization
- Indian industries often face low capacity utilization due to import competition.
- MIP helps shift demand towards domestic production, thereby improving operational efficiency and economies of scale.
3.4 Employment Generation
- Enhanced domestic production translates to more jobs in manufacturing and allied sectors (logistics, supply chains).
- Aligns with Make in India’s goal to transform India into a global manufacturing hub and reduce dependence on imports.
4. Critical Challenges & Risks Associated with MIP
While MIP may support domestic industry, it has significant economic and legal implications:
4.1 Distortion of Free Market Principles
- MIP interferes with market-determined prices, leading to artificial inflation of certain goods.
- Consumers may bear higher costs, particularly for essential or intermediate goods.
?? Case in Point: High MIP on steel once led to increased input costs for downstream industries like construction and auto manufacturing.
4.2 Potential Violation of WTO Norms
- MIP can be construed as a quantitative restriction or a form of non-tariff barrier, potentially breaching WTO rules.
- India has faced criticism in the WTO for similar measures, particularly when MIP lacks transparent justification or is extended arbitrarily.
4.3 Inefficiency and Complacency in Domestic Industry
- Overprotection can lead to inefficiency, lack of innovation, and poor quality due to absence of competition.
- Domestic firms may become complacent, failing to invest in productivity or global competitiveness.
4.4 Impact on Export Competitiveness
- Higher input costs due to MIP on raw materials can increase the cost of finished goods, affecting India’s export competitiveness.
- Exporters using imported intermediate goods may lose price advantage in global markets.
4.5 Administrative Complexity and Corruption Risks
- Enforcing MIP requires strict monitoring, especially at ports and customs.
- Potential for misclassification, undervaluation, or invoicing frauds rises, increasing administrative burden.
5. Sector-Wise Examples
Sector | MIP Use Example | Outcome |
Steel | MIP imposed in 2016 to counter Chinese imports | Short-term recovery of Indian steelmakers; later replaced with safeguard duties |
Onions | MIP used to restrict exports to control domestic prices | Helped stabilize domestic supply but hurt farmers during export bans |
Electronics | Proposals for MIP on LEDs and solar panels | Support to local electronics manufacturers but raised input costs |
6. Recommendations for Effective MIP Implementation
To align MIP with Make in India goals, the following safeguards and strategies are suggested:
? Targeted and Time-Bound Implementation
- MIP should be temporary and imposed only in sectors with clear evidence of injury due to imports.
? Transparent Review Mechanism
- Regular review of MIP’s impact on producers, consumers, and trade compliance is essential.
? Sunset Clause
- All MIP measures should come with an expiry date to avoid long-term distortion.
? Integration with Domestic Capacity Building
- MIP should be complemented with policies for tech upgradation, skill development, and R&D support.
? WTO-Consistent Safeguard Tools
- Prefer anti-dumping, countervailing duties, and safeguard measures under WTO framework instead of MIP alone.
7. Conclusion
The Minimum Import Price (MIP) mechanism can be a double-edged sword. While it offers short-term protection to domestic industry and aligns with Make in India’s objectives, it also poses long-term risks if overused or poorly implemented.
A strategic, transparent, and WTO-compliant use of MIP—alongside broader industrial and trade reforms—can boost Indias self-reliance without compromising its global competitiveness.