Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
- 0 - Views

Whether the principle enunciated by the SC related to Works Contract and VAT is applicable in Service Tax matters also?

Date 31 Aug 2008
Written By
Supreme Court Rules Sub-Contractor Turnover Separate from Main Contractor's; Implications for Service Tax Unclear
The Supreme Court's decision on works contracts and VAT, which determined that sub-contractor turnover should not be added to the main contractor's turnover, raises questions about its applicability to service tax. The judgment emphasized that sub-contractor work results in a single transaction, preventing double taxation and aligning with constitutional provisions. In service tax matters, issues arise regarding the authority to levy tax on deemed services and the identification of the actual service provider. The potential for double taxation persists despite the Cenvat Credit scheme. The article argues for government guidelines and legislative amendments to address these concerns. - (AI Summary)

Answering the following issue:

Whether the turnover of the sub-contractors (whose names are also given in the original writ petition) is to be added to the turnover of the main contractor. In other words, the question which we are required to answer is : whether the goods employed by the sub- contractors occur in the form of a single deemed sale or multiple deemed sales.

In its landmark judgment (Reported in 2008 -TMI - 30512 - SUPREME COURT)  honorable Supreme Court has held that:

"Ordinarily unless there is a contract to the contrary in the case of works contract the property in the goods used in the construction of a building passes to the owner of the land on which the building is constructed, when the goods or materials used are incorporated in the building."

In this case, honorable Apex Court further held that:

Thus, in our view, in such a case the work, executed by a sub-contractor, results in a single transaction and not as multiple transactions. This reasoning is also borne out by Section 4(7) which refers to value of goods at the time of incorporation in the works executed. In our view, if the argument of the Department is to be accepted it would result in plurality of deemed sales which would be contrary to Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution as held by the impugned judgment of the High Court. Moreover, it may result in double taxation which may make the said 2005 Act vulnerable to challenge as violative of Articles 14, 19 (1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India as held by the High Court in its impugned judgment.

What will be the position in Service Tax?

From the above decision following issues are arising relating to service tax as applicable under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994

1. Whether Central Government is empowered to levy service tax on Deemed Services? Here it is pertinent to note that to levy sales tax / vat on deemed sales, the constitution of India was amended specifically but there is no such amendment related to service tax on deemed services.

2. Service tax is levied on provision of services under section 68. Therefore, where main contractor assigns the part of the contract to the sub-contractor, who is the provider of the service and to whom? Whether the service is being provided by the sub-contractor to the main-contractor or sub-contractor to the principle directly?

3. In case, services are being provided by the sub-contractor directly to the principle who has awarded the contract originally, whether the main contractor would be held as service provider for such part undertaken by the sub-contractor.

4. On the issue of double taxation in service tax, legislatures generally argue that since the scheme of Cenvat Credit is in force, the issue of double taxable should not arise. But, if the whole of the scheme is analyzed carefully, it appears that in case of works contracts the whole scheme of Cenvat Credit has created more difficulties before the service provider than to solve the issues. Therefore, the issue of double taxable remains unsolved to that extent.

I believe that the ratio as enunciated from this judgment (2008 -TMI - 30512 - SUPREME COURT) is applicable to service tax matters also because the subject matter of tax under VAT and Service Tax is same. Therefore, central government should come out with suitable guidelines and amendments in the corresponding legislations without loss of time in the interest of public at large.

0 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present for this Article

Recent Articles