Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Flaws in a Show Cause Notice.

K Balasubramanian
GST demand quashed over defective show-cause notice and natural justice breaches; fresh SCN allowed with legal compliance A high court quashed a demand order issued under the GST show-cause process, finding defects in the SCN and breaches of natural justice after a bank account was blocked. Deficiencies included absent or incorrect hearing dates/times, reply deadlines set on or after hearing dates, and orders dated inconsistently with the hearing date. The court granted liberty to issue a fresh SCN in compliance with law. The judgment prompted administrative instructions to field formations to correct SCN practices, and taxpayers are advised to challenge flawed notices before quasi-judicial forums or courts. (AI Summary)

The intention of this article is to bring awareness amongst all tax officials who are vested with the responsibility of issuing show cause notices to issue such SCN without any flaw. The issue was recently analysed by the Allahabad High Court on 22/08/2025 reported in Reynard Corporate Solutions Private Limited Versus State of Up And 2 Others - 2025 (8) TMI 1463 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT.

The story of the case is that a show cause notice was issued on 23/11/2024 under section 73. Ex party order was passed on 15/02/2025 for the period from April 2020 to March 2021 under section 73 confirming the demand as per  SCN. The Bank account was also blocked on 23/06/2025. Left with no options, the petitioner was forced to approach the jurisdictional high court to continue the business.

The High Court noticed that there were several flaws in the SCN itself and also the principles of natural justice was not followed. While these issues were brought to the notice of the counsel for respondent, it was submitted that suitable actions are already taken to avoid similar occurrences  in future as the Commissioner has issued suitable instructions to all additional commissioners.

Para 10 of the order referred for this case, Mahaveer Trading Company Versus Deputy Commissioner State Tax And Another - 2024 (3) TMI 334 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT reads as below.

10. On query made, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel fairly submits, in light of similar occurrences,noticed in other litigation, he had apprised the Commissioner, Commercial Tax. In turn, the Commissioner,  Commercial Tax, Uttar Pradesh, has issued Office Memo No. 1406 dated 12.11.2024. The same has beenaddressed to all Additional Commissioner to be communicated to all field formations for necessary compliance. Acopy of the same has been made available to this Court. It reads as below:

'1. The column in which date of personal hearing has to be mentioned, only N.A. is mentioned without mentioning any date.

2. The column in which time of personal hearing has to be mentioned, only N.A. is mentioned without mentioning time of hearing.

3. In some cases, the date of personal hearing is prior to which reply to the Show Cause Notice has to be submitted this is non-est and this practice has to be discontinued. The date of reply to the Show Cause Notice has to be definitely prior to the date of personal hearing.

4. In some cases, the date of personal hearing is on the same date to which reply to the Show Cause Notice has to be submitted-this is non-est and this practice has to be discontinued. The date of reply to the Show Cause Notice has to be definitely prior to the date of personal hearing.

5. In all cases observed, the date of passing order either u/s 73(9)/74(9) etc. of the Act is not commensurate to the date of personal hearing. It is trite law that the date of the order has to be passed on the date of personal hearing. For eg.,the date of furnishing reply to SCN is 15.11.2023 and date of personal hearing is 17.11.2023, then the date of order has to be 17.11.2023'

The high court has accordingly set aside and quashed the order and granted liberty to issue a fresh show cause notice in accordance with law.

It may be concluded that filed formation, all over India irrespective of State or Central may follow the above principles while issuing the SCN to improve the quality of the SCN. Tax Professionals may bring in any flaw in the SCN to the notice of the Quasi Judicial Authorities or Tribunal / High Court so as to enable the taxpayer to get required relief.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles