Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Can Input Tax Credit Be Used Across Unrelated Supplies? A Key GST Ruling Brings Clarity

Ramanathan Seshan
ITC can be cross-utilized across unrelated business supplies without requiring specific input-output nexus under Section 16(1) A Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) in 2022 clarified that Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be used across unrelated business supplies under GST. The case involved a company engaged in gold and silver refining that also dealt in castor oil seeds. The initial Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling denied cross-utilization of ITC, arguing no nexus existed between gold/silver inputs and castor seed outputs. However, the AAAR overturned this decision, ruling that Section 16(1) of the CGST Act does not require specific nexus between inputs and outputs. Once validly availed, ITC merges into a common pool in the Electronic Credit Ledger and can be used for any output tax under Section 49(4). The ruling emphasized that GST operates as a business-wise system, not commodity-wise, and requiring item-wise ITC matching would create impractical compliance burdens, particularly for diverse businesses operating under single registrations. (AI Summary)

Introduction:

The promise of a seamless credit and simple life under this GST regime has often lately thrown practical dilemmas in the path of taxpayers. One such question is:

Can Input Tax Credit from one business be used for paying GST on yet another unrelated out-of-registered business?

A 2022 ruling by the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) on the case of In Re: M/s. Aristo Bullion Pvt. Ltd. - 2022 (1) TMI 1056 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT has pretty much settled this important question-especially for businesses where different commodities or product lines may be involved.

The Business Context:

Aristo Bullion was in the business of refining gold and silver dore bars. It also decided to start dealing in Castor Oil Seeds, which it bought from agriculturists, exempt from charging GST. Although inward supplies of seeds were not taxable, their onward sale was.

Since Aristo's input tax credit was collected from its bullion business, they wanted to use this ITC to pay for the outward supply of Castor Oil Seeds.

But this raised a red flag at the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR).

First Ruling: GAAR Takes a Narrow View

GAAR said that no nexus could be drawn between the inputs (i.e. gold and silver dore bars) and the outward supply, which was castor oil seeds. Hence, as per Section 16(1) of the CGST Act, it held that ITC cannot be used for paying output tax on an unrelated supply.

The position thus taken by the GAAR was, in essence:

'There is no link between gold and castor seeds; no cross-utilisation of ITC allowed.'

The Appeal: A Rational Approach by AAAR

This interpretation has been overturned by the AAAR on appeal, and it has brought back the discussion to the fundamental principles of GST.

Here is what they highlighted:

Section 16(1) allows ITC on inputs used in the course or furtherance of business, but it does not necessitate any specific nexus between inputs and outputs for recovering the input tax credit.

Once ITC is validly availed, it merges into a common pool in the Electronic Credit Ledger and can be used to pay any output tax, as per Section 49(4).

The GST framework does not mandate commodity-wise tracking or utilization of ITC—doing so would defy the intended simplicity of the system.

The AAAR pointed out that business establishments such as supermarkets or dealers of multiple goods shall not and should not be under any requirement to maintain ITC matching item-wise. Such a requirement would impose unnecessary and impractical compliance burdens.

Key Takeaway: ITC is Fungible

The AAAR thereby rightly inferred that validly availed ITC, however it may have been earned from purchases for one business activity, can now be used for any outwards taxable supply, including that of unrelated commodities.

The conclusion stated:

'The applicant can use the Input Tax Credit Balance available in its Electronic Credit Ledger, legitimately earned on inward supplies (meant for Bullions), for payment of output tax on outward supply of Castor Oil Seeds.'

Thus, not only was this compliant with the legal provisions but reinforced the spirit the GST was intended to have-a tax on the value added throughout the whole supply chain.

What This Means for Taxpayers

This ruling is now very comfortable for diverse businesses operating under a single GST registration: metals or agro-products or all possible combinations involving electronics or apparel. Keep in mind the following truths regarding the electronic credit ledger, one solid pool, and valid cross-utilization of ITC:

ITC is lawfully availed.

The inputs are in the course or furtherance of the business.

This again brings forward that GST is not a commodity-wise tax-it is a business-wise system with the whole support of ITC and not isolated activities.

Conclusion:

The ruling of Aristo Bullion brings the aspect of common sense rightly back into compliance. It is a clear indication that earning ITC involves no link to a specific output at all. For professionals and businesses grappling with GST, this is an extremely welcome precedent, based on law and practical approach.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles