Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Madras High court on Section 168A of CGST ACT

K Balasubramanian
Prior GST Council recommendation required for time extensions; post facto approvals invalidated, affecting notices and adjudications. Section 168A requires both a qualifying force majeure and a prior recommendation of the GST Council to extend statutory GST time limits. The Madras High Court held that post facto GST Council approval does not comply with Section 168A and struck down the notification dated 28/12/2023 that extended the limitation under Section 73(10). The ruling affects show cause notices and adjudication orders issued based on the invalidated notification and benefits taxpayers who received notices in the specified affected periods. (AI Summary)

In order to handle situations arising out of force majeure, Section 168A was enacted which provides for extension of time limit with prior recommendations of the GST COUNCIL. Accordingly, in order to extend a specified time limit, there are two basic requirements one being force majeure situations and prior recommendation of the GST Council. There are several notifications which provides for time extension in line with Section 168A.

It would be interesting to note that Covid 19 is undoubtedly a force majeure which had two waves whereas the Section 168A was invoked on five occasions through various notifications. It is not the case that every time there was a recommendation by the GST Council for such extension before issuance of such notifications. Government, when this lacuna was notified by various high courts took the stand that they have taken post facto approval from the GST Council, consequent to issuance of the notifications, which are tabled as below:

S No

Central tax notification

Date

1

35/2020

03/04/2020

2

14/2021

01/05/2021

3

13/2022

05/07/2022

4

09/2023

31/03/2023

5

56/2023

28/12/2023

While prior recommendation of the GST Council is available for few cases, the same was not obtained in respect of the notification dated 28/12/2023 which extended the time limit under section 73(10) for the financial years 2018/19 and 2019/2020 by one month and two months respectively over and above the period covered under the previous notification.

Ms Tata Play Limited approached the High court of Madras vide writ petition  number 17184/2024 and the Court has held that post facto approval of GST Council is not as per the Section 168A of the CGST Act 2017 and accordingly stroke down the notification dated 28/12/2013 recently.

The final order is yet to posted and a comprehensive coverage on the impact on various notifications as above shall be covered upon the availability of the Madras High Court order soon.

This order shall have huge impact on various Show Cause notices as well as Adjudication orders passed relying upon the notifications which where stroke down by the high court. Though Revenue is likely to file SLP in the Supreme Court, chances are that SLP may be dismissed as the High court has already looked in to many applicable aspects before passing the final order.

All taxpayers who receive Show Cause Notices during the period from 01/06/2025 up to 30/06/2025 pertaining to the financial year 2018/19 stand to gain. Taxpayers who receive SCN for the year 2019/20 during 01/08/2025 up to 30/09/2025 also stand to gain.

As the above order of the HIGH COURT OF MADRAS is an important verdict, readers may kindly wait for the detailed article.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles