Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Clarification by Minsitry of Finance on applicablity of Section 74 of the CGST Act,2017

Sunil Ahuja
Govt Clarifies Tax Demand Rules: Section 74 CGST Act Limits Extended Assessments to Proven Fraud or Willful Misstatement A government clarification on Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 specifies that tax demands can only be raised when there is concrete evidence of fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts by a taxpayer intending to evade tax. Without proving such elements, issuing demands under an extended period is incorrect. The instruction provides guidance for proper application of the legal provision, offering protection to taxpayers against arbitrary tax assessments. (AI Summary)

For applying the provision of Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 while raising the GST demands there should be presence / evidence of fraud, or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts by the Taxpayer with malafide intention to to evade tax. Without proving presence of such elements, the issuance of demands by invoking extended period is incorrect  The same has been explained / clarified at  Para 3.3 of Instruction No 05/2023 -GST dated 13.12.2023(Subject : Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Northern Operating Systems Private Limited (NOS). [C.C.,C.E. & S.T. – BANGALORE (ADJUDICATION) ETC. VERSUS M/S NORTHERN OPERATING SYSTEMS PVT LTD. - 2022 (5) TMI 967 - SUPREME COURT] issued by Principal Commissioner (GST), GST Policy Wing, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. The said Para is reproduced as under - 

3.3      From the perusal of wording of section 74(1) of CGST Act, it is evident that  section 74(1) can be invoked only in cases where there is a fraud or wilful mis-statement or  suppression of facts to evade tax on the part of the said Taxpayer. section 74(1) cannot be  invoked merely on account of non-payment of GST, without specific element of fraud or  wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts to evade tax. Therefore, only in the cases  where the investigation indicates that there is material evidence of fraud or wilful mis-statement or suppression of fact to evade tax on the part of the Taxpayer, provisions of  section 74(1) of CGST Act may be invoked for issuance of show cause notice, and such  evidence should also be made a part of the show cause notice.       

The said instruction has brought clarity on the matter of proper application of the said Section. The Taxpayers may refer this beneficial Instruction while contesting the demands issued by invoking the said Section. 

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles