Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

High Court issued notice to Revenue as there was no option on the GST portal to file the appeal if transitional credit was rejected

Bimal jain
Revenue Dept. faces notice after GST TRAN-1 form rejection due to clerical error; court urges GST portal improvements. The Allahabad High Court issued a notice to the Revenue Department after an individual's Form GST TRAN-1 was rejected due to a clerical error in filing transitional credit of Central Excise Duty in the wrong column. The petitioner was unable to appeal the decision because the GST portal lacked an option to file such appeals, and manual appeals were not accepted. Despite the possibility of revising the form, the request to reopen the portal was denied, prompting the petitioner to file a writ petition. The court's notice highlights the need for improvements in the GST portal to ensure procedural fairness. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of ANIL KUMAR SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 587 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURTissued notice to the Revenue Department where the Assessee’s Form GST TRAN-1 claiming transitional credit was rejected on ground that transaction credit of Central Excise Duty was filled in wrong Column and further petitioner could not file appeal on there was no option on GST portal.

Facts:

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh (“the Petitioner”) had wrongly filed TRAN-1, the claim amounting to INR 30,30,368.53/-.  Hewas served Order dated February 24, 2023 [“the Impugned Order”] whereby TRAN-1 claiming transaction credit of Central Excise Duty by thePetitioner was rejected because it was filed in the wrong column.

The Petitioner after passing of the Impugned Order, attempted filing of the appeal but it was claimed that as there was no option to file an appeal of FORM TRAN-1 on the GST portal and manual appeal by the appellate authority is not acceptable, the same could not be filed.

Further, though the Authority observed about the option to request the Commissioner to allow to revise his FORM TRAN-1, the request made in this regard qua opening the portal was not entertained.

Hence, aggrieved by the circumstances, the present writ petition was filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad.

Issue:

Whether FORM GST TRAN-1 be rejected on the ground that transaction credit of Central Excise Duty was filed in wrong Column?

Held:

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in ANIL KUMAR SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS - 2024 (11) TMI 587 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT  held as under:

  • Relied on, the case of UNION OF INDIA VERSUS BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. & ORS. - 2021 (11) TMI 109 - SUPREME COURT  where High Court issued a notice to Revenue as there was no option on the GST portal to filed appeal where transitional credit was rejected. However, in the present case, no submission has been made on the plea raised pertaining to availability of credit to the tune of INR 30,20,268.52. Hence, Notice was issued to the Revenue Department.

Our Comments:

The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad's notice to the Revenue Department underscores a critical issue in GST compliance. The lack of an option on the GST portal to appeal against rejection of transitional credit, as seen in Anil Kumar Singh's case, raises significant concerns about procedural fairness. The rejection of the Petitioner’s claim for credit due to a clerical error, compounded by the inability to file an appeal, highlights the need for a more robust and inclusive digital framework within the GST system. This step by the High Court is a crucial move towards ensuring justice and addressing systemic inadequacies in the GST portal.

 (Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles