Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Provisional Attachment under Section 83 valid when prima facie view arises that attachment is necessary to protect revenue interest

Bimal jain
Court Upholds Bank Account Attachment Under Section 83 of CGST Act, Citing Revenue Protection Against Fraudulent Invoices. The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a company challenging a provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act. The court upheld the order, asserting the necessity to protect revenue interests, as there was a prima facie nexus between the company and a non-existent supplier issuing invoices without actual goods supply. The court confirmed that the Commissioner acted within their powers to attach the company's bank account to safeguard government revenue. The attachment is valid for one year, and affected parties can file objections under the CGST Rules to contest such attachments. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of JV CREATIVES PVT. LTD. VERSUS PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DGGI, GURUGRAM ZONAL UNIT, GURUGRAM AND ANR. - 2024 (7) TMI 1385 - DELHI HIGH COURTdismissed the writ petition filed against the order of provisional attachment passed under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act(“the CGST Act”) wherein the Commissioner prima facie opined that passing of order was necessary to protect revenue interest in case where the Hon’ble High Court was of the view that there is nexus between the supplier and recipient in case wherein it has been alleged that the supplier was non-existent and the invoice has been issued without the supply of goods.

Facts:

JV Creatives (P.) Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) filed a writ petition against order dated June 26, 2024 (“the Impugned Order”) passed by DGGI Gurugram (“the Respondent”) wherein the order of provisional attachment has been passed under Section 83 of the CGST Act, alleging that the supplier of the Petitioner was non-existent and invoice have been issued without the supply of goods.

Held:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of JV CREATIVES PVT. LTD. VERSUS PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, DGGI, GURUGRAM ZONAL UNIT, GURUGRAM AND ANR. - 2024 (7) TMI 1385 - DELHI HIGH COURT held that the facts clearly indicate that the Respondent Commissioner found it necessary to provisionally attach the Petitioner bank account to protect the interest of the revenue, it clearly seems that there is nexus between the supplier and the Petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed and the Impugned Order is upheld.

Our Comments:

As per Section 83(1) of the CGST Act, after initiation of assessment (Chapter-XII), inspection, search, seizure and arrest (Chapter XIV) and Demand and Recovery (Chapter XV) proceedings, the Commissioner is empowered to attach any property provisionally (including bank account) belonging to any taxable person or any person under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act to protect government revenue interest. However, as per Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, the provisional attachment is effective only for a period of one year from the date of passing of order under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act. Further, as per Rule 159(1) of the CGST Rules, the Commissioner is required to pass order in Form GST DRC-22, for attachment of property, including bank account. Furthermore, as per Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules, any person whose property is attached may file an objection in FORM GST DRC-22A to the effect that the property attached was or is not liable to attachment, and the Commissioner may, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the person filing the objection, release the said property by an order in Form GST DRC- 23.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles