Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Granting of hearing opportunity is mandatory under Section 75(4) before passing of adverse order

Bimal jain
Hearing Mandatory Before Adverse Order Under Section 75(4) of CGST Act, Rules Karnataka High Court in Tax Case. The Karnataka High Court ruled that granting a hearing is mandatory under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act before issuing an adverse order. The case involved a petition by a golf club challenging an assessment order and notifications related to tax liabilities for the periods 2017-18 and 2018-19. The petitioner argued that the order was issued without a hearing, violating the CGST Act. The court set aside the order, emphasizing the necessity of providing a hearing opportunity when an adverse decision is considered against an assessee. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in M/S. BANGALORE GOLF CLUB VERSUS COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (ENFORCEMENT) , BENGALURU, THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, BENGALURU, THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (ENFORCEMENT) , BENGALURU - 2024 (6) TMI 696 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT, set aside the assessment order as no opportunity of hearing was granted to the Assessee before passing of adverse order, thereby holding that, it is mandatory to grant opportunity of hearing as required under section 75(4) of the CGST Act when an adverse order is being contemplated against the Assessee.

Facts:

Bangalore Golf Club (“the Petitioner”), filed a writ petition against order dated December 29, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) passed by the Revenue department (“the Respondent”) challenging the liability imposed on them under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act for the tax periods of 2017-18 and 2018-19 and also prayed for setting aside of the notifications dated 13.07.2022 and 06.04.2023. The Petitioner contended that the clubbing of financial years and passing a common order was impermissible. Further, it was argued that the Petitioner was not granted an opportunity of hearing in case of passing of adverse order as required under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act.

Issue:

Whether it is mandatory to grant opportunity of hearing as required under section 75(4) of the CGST Act when an adverse order is being contemplated against the Assessee?

Held:

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in M/S. BANGALORE GOLF CLUB VERSUS COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (ENFORCEMENT) , BENGALURU, THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, BENGALURU, THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (ENFORCEMENT) , BENGALURU - 2024 (6) TMI 696 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURTset aside the Impugned Order as no opportunity of hearing was granted by the Respondent which was required under section 75(4) of the CGST Act in case any order for levy of tax, penalty, or any other adverse decision is being contemplated against the Petitioner.

Relevant provision:

Section 75(4) of the CGST Act:

            Section 75: General provisions relating to determination of tax

(4) An opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles