Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
- 0 - Views

LITIGATION MANAGEMENT IN GST REGIME (PART -3)

Date 06 Jun 2024
Written By
Understanding Section 75 of CGST Act 2017: Tax Determination, Adjudication, and Importance of Compliance in Tax Administration
Section 75 of the CGST Act, 2017, outlines the general provisions for tax determination, excluding the period of stay and pending appeals from the time calculation for issuing show cause notices or orders. It mandates that no notice is needed for recovering unpaid self-assessed taxes and interest. Adjudication is crucial for fair tax administration, requiring officers to act without bias and ensure justice. An adjudication order, or Order-in-Original (OIO), concludes a show cause notice, detailing facts, hearings, and findings. It must be complete, well-reasoned, and compliant with legal standards, allowing for challenges if it violates principles like natural justice. - (AI Summary)

Section 75 of CGST Act, 2017, provides for general provisions for determination of tax. This section provides that the period of stay, if any, would be excluded while calculating the time period for issuance of show cause notice or passing of order. The section further provides that the time period during which appeal is pending in any appellate for a would be excluded while calculating the time period for issuance of such notice or passing of order. This section also provides that no such notice needs to be issued for recovery of unpaid  self-assessed tax as per return and interest thereon. This section also provides that the adjudication proceedings shall be deemed to be concluded if the order is not issued within the statutory time limit.

Adjudication is an important function of the tax administration by the proper officers. A fair adjudication ensures that no economic loss is caused to the revenue authorities by alleged contravention by the person.

The authorities exercising quasi-judicial function are duty bound to justify their existence and carry credibility with the people by inspiring confidence in the adjudicatory  process. The public is entitled to have assurance that process of correction is in place and working. It is the requirement of law that correction process of judgments should not only appear to be implemented but also seem to have been properly implemented. These functions, therefore, cast a heavy responsibility on the officers invested with the powers of adjudication and confiscation to use it with utmost care and caution, free from any prejudice or bias, so that the innocent does not suffer by any injustice done to him and the real offender does not escape the punishment provided by law.

Adjudication Order

  • The issuance of a Show Cause Notice logically comes to an end by issuance of an order called adjudication order also called as Order-in-Original (OIO).
  • The demand proposed in a Show Cause Notice will be dropped or confirmed by the order.
  • The order is issued by the officer, called adjudicating authority who adjudicates the Show Cause Notice.
  • The order generally contains the following –
    • Background and brief facts of Show Cause Notice
    • Reply to Show Cause Notice, if any (defence grounds)
    • Personal hearing (who attended, when)
    • Discussions and findings (Analysis)
    • Conclusion or order.
  • An order shall follow the following principles / doctrines:
  • legislative intention
  • reasoned or speaking order
  • natural justice
  • judicial discipline
  • res judicata
  • noscitur-a-sociis
  • A sustainable order is complete, legally compliant, unambiguous and properly drafted with quantified demand of tax, and penalties.
  • Non-speaking and vague order ought to be avoided.
  • A proper adjudication order must be a speaking or well reasoned order
  • Order should be in writing, numbered, dated and signed by the adjudicating authority.

Adjudication Order – How to read and make sense

On receiving the adjudication order issued by the adjudicating authority (proper officer), the taxpayer should know / ascertain the following:

  • Ascertain whether the order (Order-in-Original or OIO) is complete in all respects, i.e., dated, numbered, signed etc.
  • Ascertain whether the order is within prescribed limitation period.
  • If under CGST law, OIO should contain Document Identification Number (DIN) without which it will not be considered as a valid document. It may be noted that certain states have also started assigning document reference number.
  • Check if OIO is complete as seen from page numbering and contains annexures / computation sheet etc as mentioned in the OIO.
  • Verify as to OIO contains correct facts of noticee as well as details of personal hearing, dates etc.
  • Ascertain that OIO is not vague in content and contains demand of tax, interest and penalties, if any, properly quantified.
  • Ascertain if the OIO contains any mistake or error which is apparent from record and which calls for action under section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017 for rectification of mistake.
  • Whether all the grounds / contentions of noticee have been considered and addressed.
  • No demand can be confirmed on the ground other than grounds specified in the SCN.
  • Whether the OIO has travelled beyond the scope of the SCN itself.
  • Take note if the order is in violation of principle of natural justice. If so, it will have to be challenged accordingly.
  • An OIO has to be a well reasoned / speaking order. If not so, it is a defective order which can be legally challenged.
  • An OIO shall follow binding precedents and judicial discipline.
  • An OIO may confirm the demand in full or allow partial or full relief. OIO can also order to drop the SCN proceedings.
  • Further line of action by the assessee would be taken once the OIO is read and understood.
0 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present for this Article

Recent Articles