Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Assessee would be considered as electronic commerce operator when digital gold is sold through the platform and sale amount is directly paid through escrow account for which commission is charged

Bimal jain
Online Platform Selling Digital Gold Classified as E-Commerce Operator, Must Collect Tax Under CGST Act Section 52 The Karnataka Authority for Advance Rulings determined that a company providing an online platform for selling digital gold qualifies as an electronic commerce operator. This classification requires the company to collect tax at source under Section 52 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The ruling clarified that the company, which facilitates the sale of digital gold through an escrow account and charges a commission, is not merely an agent. Consequently, the company must register as an electronic commerce operator, adhering to the relevant GST regulations and notifications. (AI Summary)

The Karnataka, AAR in the case of IN RE: M/S. CHANGEJAR TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. [2024 (3) TMI 261 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA] ruled that the Applicant would be considered as electronic commerce operator and is required to collect tax at source in case where the digital gold is sold through the platform and sale amount is directly paid through escrow account for which commission is charged.

Facts:

M/s. Changejar Technologies Private Limited (“the Applicant”) is a company engaged in the business of providing online micro saving and investment platform by way of application name Jar for which the Applicant entered into a distribution agreement with the Digital Gold India Private Limited (“the Seller”) for offering sale of seller gold on its platform.

The Applicant has filed an application for advance ruling as to whether the Applicant would be considered as Agent who only collects a commission as a percentage of the value of digital gold sold through the platform and entire sale proceeds which are paid directly to the seller through escrow account and hence, would not fall within the purview of Notification No. 52/2018-Central Tax dated September 20, 2018(“the Notification”) read with Section 52 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”). Also, the query was raised as to whether the Applicant is required to obtain registration as an E-Commerce Operator as per Rule 12 of the CGST Rules.

Issue:

Whether the Applicant would be considered as agent or electronic commerce operator and required to collect tax at source in case where the digital gold is sold through the platform and sale amount is directly paid through escrow account for which commission is charged?

Held:

The Karnataka, AAR in the case of IN RE: M/S. CHANGEJAR TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. [2024 (3) TMI 261 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA] held as under:

  • Observed that, Electronic Commerce Operator means any person who owns, operates or manages digital or electronic facility or platform for electronic commerce i.e. supply of goods or services or both, including digital products over digital or electronic network.
  • Noted that, the Applicant owns digital platform for offering sale of seller digital gold. Further, the agreement entered by the Applicant with the Seller is for distribution and termed as Distribution Agreement.
  • Opined that, neither the Applicant nor the Seller are the agent to each other and as the sale of seller products are through the Applicant online platform, the Applicant would fall within the purview of Electronic Commerce Operator.
  • Ruled that, the Applicant would qualify as an electronic commerce operator and would fall within the purview of the Notification read with Section 52 of the CGST Act.
  • Further Ruled that, the Applicant being an electronic commerce operator, is required to collect the tax at source under Section 52 of the CGST Act, and is required to obtain compulsory registration.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles