Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Central GST Authority cannot initiate proceedings when State GST Authority has already initiated proceedings on the same subject matter

Bimal jain
Central GST Authority Can't Proceed if State GST Authority Already Initiated Action, Rules on Section 6(2)(b) of CGST Act 2017. The Gauhati High Court ruled that the Central GST Authority cannot initiate proceedings on a subject matter if the State GST Authority has already done so. This decision was based on Section 6(2)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The case involved a petitioner who received Show Cause Notices from both State and Central GST Authorities for allegedly wrongfully availing input tax credit. The court stayed the proceedings initiated by the Central GST Authority, emphasizing that only one authority should handle the matter to avoid duplication. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in the case of RAJESH MITTAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, THECOMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, THE SUPERINTENDENT (ANTI EVASION) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX - 2024 (2) TMI 127 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT  relying upon the provision of sub-clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”) stayed the proceeding initiated by the Revenue Department, thereby holding that, Central GST Authority should not have issued the SCN when State GST Authorities have already issued SCN on the same issue

Facts:

The Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) served a Show Cause Notice dated December 01, 2023 issued by the State GST Authorities and December 27, 2023 issued by Central GST Authority,(“the SCN”) to Rajesh Mittal (“the Petitioner”), stating that the Petitioner had wrongly availed the input tax credit (“ITC”) thereby violating the provisions of Section 16 (4) of the CGST Act for which reply was filed by the Petitioner.

Held:

The Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in the case of RAJESH MITTAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, THECOMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, THE SUPERINTENDENT (ANTI EVASION) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX - 2024 (2) TMI 127 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT  relying upon the provision of sub-clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the CGST Act, stayed the proceedings initiated by the Respondent on the ground that, Central GST Authority should not have issued the SCN when State GST Authorities have already issued SCN on the same issue.

Relevant Provisions:

Section 6 (2)(b) of CGST Act

“Section 6(2)(b): Authorisation of officers of State tax or Union territory tax as proper officer in certain circumstances

(2) Subject to the conditions specified in the notification issued under sub-section (1),

(b) Where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by the proper officer under this Act on the same subject matter.”

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles