ITC cannot be denied in case of bonafide errors in filing GST returns where no loss of revenue occurs

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of NRB BEARINGS LTD. VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SCST, THANE COMMISSIONERATE, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, BAJAJ AUTO LTD. - 2024 (2) TMI 853 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT, allowed the petition while permitting the Assessee to rectify FORM GSTR-1 and held that in cases of bonafide errors in filing returns where no loss of revenue occurs, the technicalities should not prevent rectification.

Facts:

NRB Bearings Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) approached the Jurisdictional Officer (“the Respondent 1”) to allow the Petitioner to amend the invoice details pertaining to the Financial Year 2017-18 in FORM GSTR-1 for the month of December, 2019.

During the pendency of the said application, the Petitioner received confirmation from the job workers that they have not availed Input Tax Credit (“ITC”). On January 06, 2022, an application was filed before the Central Jurisdictional Commissionerate in relation to the disallowance of credit to M/s Balaji Auto Ltd. (“the Respondent-2”) on account of the mismatch between FORM GSTR-3B and FORM GSTR-2A. It was stated that by communication received by the Petitioner on January 27, 2022, the Respondent-2 had informed the Petitioner that no proceedings could be initiated against the Respondent-2, in this regard as no communication was received from the State Jurisdictional Commissionerate.

The Petitioner also referred to the guidelines which were issued by the State of Maharashtra in its Circular No. 02A of 2022dated February 25, 2022 on the issues arising from ITC claims, in pursuance of which, it was contended that on May 09, 2022, the Petitioner obtained a certificate from its Chartered Accountant, certifying that the Petitioner had duly discharged GST on the transaction in dispute. The said certificate was stated to be shared by the Petitioner with the Respondent-2 on August 23, 2022. However, no response was received.

Hence, aggrieved by the circumstances, the Petitioner has filed the present wit petition.

Issue:

Whether ITC can be denied on bonafide errors in filing returns where no loss of revenue occurs?

Held:

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in NRB BEARINGS LTD. VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SCST, THANE COMMISSIONERATE, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, BAJAJ AUTO LTD. - 2024 (2) TMI 853 - BOMBAY HIGH COURTheld as under:

• Relied on, STAR ENGINEERS (I) PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-GST - 2023 (12) TMI 729 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT, wherein the court observed that in cases where there was a bonafide error in filing of the return and when there was no loss of revenue caused to the Government/exchequer, the technicalities on any legitimate rectification ought not to come in the way of the assessee, so as to suffer an inadvertent error, which would have a cascading effect. 
• Held that, the petition by permitting the petitioner to rectify the FORM GSTR-1 for the period 2017-18. Hence, the writ petition was allowed.

Our Comments:

Section 39 of the CGST Act talks about “Furnishing of Returns”. According to Section 39(9) of the CGST Actwhere any registered person after furnishing a return under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or sub-section (4) or sub-section (5) discovers any omission or incorrect particulars therein, other than as a result of scrutiny, audit, inspection or enforcement activity by the tax authorities, he shall rectify such omission or incorrect particulars.

In Pari Materia case of the Hon’ble Orissa High Court in M/S. Y.B. CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS - 2023 (3) TMI 111 - ORISSA HIGH COURT, permitted the assessee to rectify the error of mentioning B2C instead of B2B in FORM GSTR-1 at the time of filing of returns, holding that the assessee would be prejudiced if it is not allowed to avail the benefits of ITC. Directed the Respondent to receive the corrected FORM GSTR-1 manually and upload the details on the web portal within 4 weeks.

Hence, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has rightly passed the decision that when there is no revenue loss then FORM GSTR-1 can be amended in order to claim ITC.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])