Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Appellant can remit the amount of pre-deposit from attached bank accounts for filing an appeal

Bimal jain
Petitioner Allowed to Use Attached Bank Accounts for Pre-Deposit in CGST Act Appeal by Jan 31, 2024 The Tripura High Court ruled that a petitioner can remit the pre-deposit amount from attached bank accounts to file an appeal under the CGST Act. The petitioner missed the appeal deadline and faced challenges due to attached bank accounts under recovery proceedings. The court directed the bank to allow the petitioner to remit the pre-deposit from these accounts, enabling the filing of an appeal by January 31, 2024, as per a government notification. The appellate authority must consider the appeal promptly if filed within the stipulated conditions. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Tripura High Court in the case ofKAMRUL NAHAR VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS - 2024 (1) TMI 431 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT, directed the bank to permit the Petitioner to remit amount of pre-deposit as required in terms of Notification No. 53/2023 dated November 04, 2023(“the Notification”) from attached bank accounts to enable the Petitioner to file appeal within cut-off date.

Facts:

Kamrul Nahar (“the Petitioner”) did not invoke the appellate remedy underSection 107(1) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) within the stipulated time. He approached this Court straightaway after the expiration of the limitation period.

Though the Petitioner took several grounds on facts and laws including the ground of non-compliance of principles of natural justice and the procedure prescribed under Section 73(1) of the CGST Act, the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) objected to the maintainability of the petition, on the basis of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) LTU, KAKINADA & ORS. VERSUS M/S. GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED - 2020 (5) TMI 149 - SUPREME COURT.

Meanwhile, the Finance Department Government of Tripura recognised the challenges faced by the taxpayers and issued the Notification, allowing a window of opportunity for individuals unable to file appeals against orders passed on or before March 31, 2023, under Sections 73 or 74 of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the TSGST Act”)within the time period specified under section 107(1) read with sub-section (4) of the TSGST Act subject to the conditions stipulated thereunder. This window of opportunity is also available to such taxable persons whose appeal was rejected solely on the grounds that it was not filed within the time period specified in Section 107 of the CGST Act

The Petitioner faced a challenge as all of their bank accounts had been attached in recovery proceedings under Section 79 of the TSGST Act. This situation further hindered the Petitioner's ability to approach the appellate authority against the Orders passed within the prescribed time frame.

Hence, aggrieved by the circumstances, the Petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

Issue:

Whether the Appellant can remit the amount of pre-deposit from attached bank accounts for filing an appeal?

Held:

The Hon’ble Tripura High Court in KAMRUL NAHAR VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS - 2024 (1) TMI 431 - TRIPURA HIGH COURTheld as under:

  • Observed that, the Court is not required to enter into the issues of fact or law raised by the Petitioner, as the Petitioner has the liberty to invoke the appellate remedy under section 107(1) of the CGST Act by the cut-off date January 31, 2024 in terms of the Notification.
  • Held that, the bank accounts of the Petitioner have been attached in recovery proceedings. Therefore, in order to allow the Petitioner to effectively avail the remedy of appeal as provided under the Notification, the Court directed the Branch Manager, ICICI Bank, Bishalgarh Branch to permit the Petitioner to remit the amount of pre-deposit as required in terms of the Notification from the attached bank accounts on such application being made through the permissible mode for preferring the appeal within the cut-off date January 31, 2024. If such an appeal is filed upon compliance with the conditions stipulated in the Notification, the appellate authority would consider the appeal in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of filing of the appeal.

Our Comments:

Section 107 of the CGST Act talks about “Appeals to Appellate Authority”. According to Section 107 (6) (b) of the CGST Act, no appeal shall be filed under sub-section (1) of Section 107 of the CGST Act, unless the appellant has paid a sum equal to ten per cent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said order, subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees, in relation to which the appeal has been filed.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles