Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Medical reason is a valid reason for condoning delay in filing an Appeal before the Appellate Authority

Bimal jain
Medical Condition Valid for Delay in Filing Appeal Under CGST Act, Rules Court in Septic Shock Case The Madras High Court ruled that a medical condition can be a valid reason for condoning a delay in filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority under the CGST Act. In the case involving a petitioner who missed the appeal deadline due to septic shock, the court acknowledged that the Appellate Authority can condone delays beyond the standard period if justified by sufficient cause. The petitioner, who had already paid the tax liability, sought to appeal penalties and interest. The court directed the appeal to be filed within ten days from the order's receipt, allowing it to be considered on its merits. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of GREAT HEIGHTS DEVELOPERS LLP VERSUS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST & CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI NORTH AND COMMISSIONER OF GST APPEAL – I, CHENNAI - 2024 (3) TMI 112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT, allowed the appeal before the Appellate Authority and held that if the Assessee demonstrates that the delay in filing appeal was due to valid mitigating circumstances such as medical condition then the Appellate Authority can condone delay and consider appeal on its merits.

Facts:

M/s.Great Heights Developers LLP (“the Petitioner”) was served a Show Cause Notice (“the SCN”) pursuant to which an Assessment Order dated August 14, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) issuedimposing interest and penalty under Section 73(9) and 73(7) of theCentral Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”). The Impugned Order was received by the Petitioner on August 16, 2023. Accordingly, the appeal should have been filed within 90 days thereof under sub-section (1) of Section 73 of the CGST Act. However, the appeal could not be filed in time because the Petitioner was diagnosed with septic shock and could not follow up with the consultant. As a result, the time limit for filing an appeal with an application to condone delay expired on December 16, 2023.

Hence, aggrieved by the Impugned Order, the present writ was filed by the Petitioner.

Issue:

Whether medical reason is a valid reason for condoning delay in filing an Appeal before the Appellate Authority?

Held:

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in GREAT HEIGHTS DEVELOPERS LLP VERSUS ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST & CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI NORTH AND COMMISSIONER OF GST APPEAL – I, CHENNAI - 2024 (3) TMI 112 - MADRAS HIGH COURTheld as under:

  • Noted that, under Section 107 of the CGST Act, the Appellate Authority does not have the power to condone delay beyond 120 days i.e., sub-section (4) of Section 107 of the CGST Act, the appeal can be filed within the period of three months or six months, as the case may be, allow it to be presented within a further period of one month. In the current case, the period of further delay is only 24 days and the Petitioner has provided cogent reasons to explain such delay. It is pertinent to note that the Petitioner has paid the entire tax liability and the proposed appeal is limited to penalty and interest.
  • Held that, the Appellate Authority receive and dispose of the appeal on merits if the appeal is received within a maximum period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
  • Hence, the writ was disposed of.

Our Comments:

Section 107 of the CGST Act, talks about “Appeals to Appellate Authority”. According to Section 107(4), the Appellate Authority may, if he is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the aforesaid period of three months or six months, as the case may be, allow it to be presented within a further period of one month.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles