Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Number of witnesses to be examined and time period of incarceration to be taken into consideration while granting bail

Bimal jain
Bail Granted Due to Prolonged Detention and Near Trial Conclusion; Accused Released Under Section 439 CrPC. The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to an accused individual due to prolonged incarceration and the nearing conclusion of the trial, with only two formal witnesses left to testify. The accused had sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, related to charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. The court ordered the release on bail with surety bonds, subject to the satisfaction of the relevant Trial Court or Duty Magistrate, considering the extended detention period exceeding two years. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of PRAVEEN KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA [2024 (1) TMI 811 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT]granted the bail to the Accused on the ground that, the Accused has been incarcerated for a long period of time and the trial is at the end stage with only two formal witnesses to be examined.

Facts:

Praveen Kumar (“the Petitioner”) filed an application for grant of regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the CrPC”), pertaining to FIR under Section 420, 467, 468, 201 and 120-B of IPC and Section 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of Central Goods Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”).

Held:

The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of PRAVEEN KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA [2024 (1) TMI 811 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] held that only two formal witnesses have been examined. Also, the Petitioner has been incarcerated for a period of more than two years. Therefore, the Hon’ble High Court directed the Petitioner to be released on bail and surety bonds subject to the satisfaction of concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

Relevant Provision:

Section 439 of the CrPC:

            “Section 439: Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail.

  1. A High Court or Court of Session may direct,--

(a) that any person accused of an offence and in custody be released on bail, and if the offence is of the nature specified in sub-section (3) of section 437, may impose any condition which it considers necessary for the purposes mentioned in that sub-section;

(b) that any condition imposed by a Magistrate when releasing any person on bail be set aside or modified:

Provided that the High Court or the Court of Session shall, before granting bail to a person who is accused of an offence which is triable exclusively by the Court of Session or which, though not so triable, is punishable with imprisonment for life, give notice of the application for bail to the Public Prosecutor unless it is, for reasons to be recorded in writing, of opinion that it is not practicable to give such notice.

(2) A High Court or Court of Session may direct that any person who has been released on bail under this Chapter be arrested and commit him to custody………”

Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles