Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Rectification in return to be allowed when ITC in GSTR-3B accounted as IGST credit instead of CGST and SGST credit erroneously

Bimal jain
Rectification in tax returns allowed for ITC errors in GSTR-3B: Misclassified IGST can be adjusted to CGST/SGST. The Kerala High Court ruled that rectification in tax returns should be allowed when Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B is mistakenly accounted as Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) instead of Central and State Goods and Services Tax (CGST and SGST). The petitioner had filed a writ petition seeking correction of this error and a refund of IGST ITC, with adjustments towards SGST and CGST liabilities. The court directed that the petitioner's representation be treated as a rectification application and mandated a decision within two months, following a proper hearing. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of CHUKKATH KRISHNAN PRAVEEN VERSUS STATE OF KERALA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TAX PAYER SERVICES DIVISION - WADAKKANCHERY, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR, STATE TAX OFFICER, ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS - 2023 (12) TMI 513 - KERALA HIGH COURT  allowed the writ petition and directed that, the rectification in return should be allowed when Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) in GSTR-3B is accounted as the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (“IGST”) credit instead of the Central Goods and Services Tax (“CGST”) and the State Goods and Services Tax (“SGST”) credit erroneously.

Facts:

M/s. Chukkath Krishnan Praveen (“the Petitioner”) committed the error in filing GSTR-3B returns based on which the Assessment Order dated August 21, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) was passed. The Petitioner made a representation before the Respondent Authorities vide Representation dated October 21, 2023 (“the Representation”) for rectifying the mistake/error in the returns filed.

Thereafter, the Petitioner filed a writ petition for directing the Revenue Department to permit the Petitioner to rectify the mistake in Form GSTR-3B by accounting the ITC as IGST instead of CGST and SGST ITC. The Petitioner also prayed for refund of IGST ITC and thereafter, adjusting the IGST credit towards SGST and CGST liability. The Petitioner also prayed that the Representation filed by the Petitioner be treated as a Rectification Application.

Issue:

Whether rectification in return be allowed when ITC in GSTR-3B is accounted as IGST credit instead of CGST and SGST credit erroneously?

Held:

The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of CHUKKATH KRISHNAN PRAVEEN VERSUS STATE OF KERALA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TAX PAYER SERVICES DIVISION - WADAKKANCHERY, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, POOTHOLE, THRISSUR, STATE TAX OFFICER, ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS - 2023 (12) TMI 513 - KERALA HIGH COURT disposed the writ petition and directed that the Representation filed by the Petitioner be treated as Rectification application and pass the necessary order in accordance with law after granting a proper hearing to the Petitioner within a period of two months.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles