Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Assessee's duty to monitor GST Portal after cancellation of GST registration

Bimal jain
Taxpayers Must Monitor GST Portal for Notices Post-Registration Cancellation, Says Court; Valid Service Under CGST Act The Kerala High Court ruled that it is the taxpayer's responsibility to monitor the GST portal for any notices or orders, even after the cancellation of GST registration. In the case involving a construction company, the court found that the assessment order posted on the GST portal was a valid service method under the CGST Act. The petitioner claimed improper notice regarding a demand for tax payment, but the court dismissed this, emphasizing the taxpayer's obligation to regularly check the portal for communications from the tax department. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in KODUVAYUR CONSTRUCTIONS VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-WORKS CONTRACT, STATE GST DEPARTMENT KERALA, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE (ARREAR RECOVERY) - 2023 (8) TMI 834 - KERALA HIGH COURT  held that, it is assessee’s responsibility to check the GST portal for any notice or order that had been served on it the assessment order was not served in a valid manner was untenable.

Facts:

M/s. Koduvayur Constructions (“the Petitioner”) a registered dealer under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(“the CGST Act”) whose GST registration was cancelled by the order dated October 21, 2021 w.e.f. September 01, 2021. The Petitioner was under the impression that it had no liability to pay the taxes under the GST law.

However, the Assistant Commissioner (“the Respondent”) issued an assessment order on the common portal dated October 14, 2022 (“theassessment Order”) demanding payment of INR 19,22,566/-.

The petitioner alleges that it was not served with proper notice as provided under the CGST Act. Hence, the entire proceedings leading to cancellation of GST registration and the same is liable to be quashed.

Issue:

Whether service of an assessment order on common GST portal after cancellation of GST registration can be considered an effective mode of service of order under GST law?   

Held:

The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in KODUVAYUR CONSTRUCTIONS VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-WORKS CONTRACT, STATE GST DEPARTMENT KERALA, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE (ARREAR RECOVERY) - 2023 (8) TMI 834 - KERALA HIGH COURT  held as under: -

  • Observed that, a plain reading of Section 169(1) (a) to (f) of the CGST Act, makes it clear that any decision, order, summons, notice, or communication under the CGST Act and its rules can be served on the taxpayer through any one of the methods listed.
  • Further observed that, section 169(1)(d) of the CGST Act recognizes availability of order on common GST portal as an effective manner of delivery of order.
  • Noted that, in the present case the Assessment order was made available on common portal which is a valid mode of service as provided under section 169(1) of CGST Act.
  • Held that, it is Petitioner’s duty to check and verify the common GST portal for any communication from Revenue Department and it was Petitioner’s fault to have failed to do so.
  • Dismissed the writ filed by the Petitioner.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles