Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Direct supplies by vendor to customer not to be included in assessable value of the assessee

Bimal jain
Supreme Court rules goods delivered directly to customers not included in assessable value for excise duty. The Supreme Court ruled that items directly delivered to customers, bypassing the assessee's factory, should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes. SS Engineers, engaged in sugar plant projects, used both self-manufactured and market-procured goods, the latter delivered directly to customer sites. The Revenue Department argued these should be included in the assessable value. However, the Court held that since these items never entered the assessee's premises and no input tax credit was claimed, they should not be subject to excise duty, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE PUNE II VERSUS SS ENGINEERS - 2023 (7) TMI 717 - SC ORDERdismissed the appeal of the Revenue and held that, value of items which were directly delivered to customer’s place and which never entered in the factory of the assessee should not be added to assessable value of goods supplied by the assessee.

Facts:

SS Engineers (“the Respondent”) is inter alia engaged in erection, installation and commissioning of sugar plant for which it uses own manufactured goods and procures goods from market which are directly delivered to customer’s place (erection site).

The Respondent availed ITC of own manufactured goods and paid the excise duty on such goods however, the Respondent has neither paid excise duty nor availed ITC on goods which are directly supplied from market to customer place as the excise duty on bought out items were paid by the manufacturer of such items.

The Revenue Department was of the view that the bought-out items (goods which are directly procured from market and delivered to customer’s place) should be added to assessable value of supplies made by Respondent.

Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice (“the SCN”) was issued to the Respondent for the period July, 2000 to September, 2007 demanding excise duty on bought out items.

The Adjudicating Authority vide order-in-original dated December 27, 2016 (“the OIO”) confirmed the demand and imposed the penalty on the Respondent and further noted that the Respondent has supressed the facts that the bought-out items were used in manufacturing of sugar plant and thus, excise duty was leviable.

Aggrieved by the OIO, the Responded filed an appeal before the CESTAT who vide an order (“the Impugned order”) held that the bought-out items are not liable to excise duty since, the Respondent have not manufactured the same in his factory. Thus, the demand of excise duty is not valid.

Aggrieved by the Impugned order, the Appellant filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme court.

Issue:

Whether the value of bought out items should be added to be assessable value of the goods for payment of excise duty by the Respondent?

Held:

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE PUNE II VERSUS SS ENGINEERS - 2023 (7) TMI 717 - SC ORDER held as under:

  • Observed that, the Revenue Department has previously taken the stand that the bought-out items which did not entered in the Respondent premise, moreover no credit was claimed on such goods by the Respondent, there is no case for adding value of such goods in the assessable value of the goods and no excise duty was leviable.
  • Held that, no proceeding need be initiated in the form of the SCN.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles