Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Directed the AO to allow cross examination of witness by the assessee

Bimal jain
Assessing Officer Must Allow Full Cross-Examination Under Indian Evidence Act, Court Rules in Favor of Petitioner The Jharkhand High Court directed the Assessing Officer to permit the petitioner to cross-examine witnesses in line with the Indian Evidence Act. Initially, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) allowed cross-examination, but the Assistant Commissioner later restricted it by denying certain questions. The petitioner objected, leading to a petition arguing for the right to conduct cross-examination independently. The court held that while the presiding officer can control proceedings, they must adhere to the Indian Evidence Act. The petitioner was advised to file for a recall of witnesses to address previously discarded questions, ensuring effective cross-examination. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court in MADHU KORAH VERSUS INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, INCOME TAX, PATNA BIHAR AND OTHERS - 2023 (6) TMI 94 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURThad directedthe Assessing Officer (“the AO”) to allow cross examination of witness by the assessee in accordance with provision of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (“the Indian Evidence Act”).

Facts:

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) Jamshedpur, (“the CITA”) passed 2 orders dated December 26, 2013, and August 14, 2014, permitting cross examination of witness to Madhu Korah (“the Petitioner”). Accordingly, cross-examination of some witness was done in 2019. Thereafter no further development took place. The Revenue department issued summons to the Petitioner for cross-examination of witness and the Petitioner participated in cross-examination process. However, the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination.

Aggrieved by such restriction the Petitioner raised objections which were disposed by the Revenue Department vide Order dated January 24, 2023 ('the Impugned Order”).

Being aggrieved, the Petitioner has filed this petition inter alia contending that the Petitioner should be allowed to conduct cross examination on its own or through an independent officer.

Issue:

Whether the AO has power to discard the question of the Petitioner during the cross examination?

Held:
The Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court in MADHU KORAH VERSUS INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, INCOME TAX, PATNA BIHAR AND OTHERS - 2023 (6) TMI 94 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT held as under:

  • Observed that, the presiding officer has power to control the proceeding. However, the officer has to follow the guidelines and the provision of the Indian Evidence Act.
  • Directed the Petitioner, to file petition for recall of the witnesses who have been earlier cross-examined and seek the answers of the question which have been initially discarded by the AO.
  • Further, directed the Revenue department to provide effective cross-examination opportunity in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles