Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Practicing CA_CS_CMAs under the scanner with new amendment in PMLA

Vivek Jalan
Amendment to PMLA: Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and CMAs now 'Reporting Entities' for client transactions. Notification No. S.O.2036(E), dated 03.05.2023, amends the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), expanding the definition of 'Reporting Entity' to include practicing professionals such as Chartered Accountants (CA), Company Secretaries (CS), and Cost and Management Accountants (CMA). These professionals are now accountable for financial transactions conducted on behalf of clients, including property transactions, asset management, and company operations. The amendment aims to combat shell companies and aligns with FATF recommendations. Professionals must perform due diligence, report suspicious activities, and maintain records for five years, although legal professionals are excluded from this change. (AI Summary)

The biggest development of the week is Notification No. S.O.2036(E), dated 03.05.2023 amending Section 2 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The MoF has widened the ambit of the term “Reporting Entity” as defined in Section 2(1)(wa), read with sec. 2 (1)(sa) of the PMLA. As per the amended norms, financial transactions carried out by practicing Professionals (PPs) - CA/CS/CMA, on behalf of their clients will now fall under the scope of the PMLA. However, lawyers and legal professionals have been kept out of the new definition of entities covered under the Act. The government may have brought about the changes in the PMLA against the backdrop of rising cases of shell companies. One must remember that in March 2023, the government had widened the ambit of reporting entities under money laundering provisions to incorporate more disclosures for non-governmental organisations and defined politically exposed persons (PEPs) under the PMLA in line with the recommendations of the FATF. The MoF has notified that the “financial transactions” carried out by these persons on behalf of their clients, in the course of their profession, in relation to the following activities shall be under the scanner -

(i) buying and selling of any immovable property;

(ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;

(iii) management of bank, savings or securities accounts;

(iv) organisation of contributions for the creation, operation or management of companies;

(v) creation, operation or management of companies, limited liability partnerships or trusts, and buying and selling of business entities, The implications of this notification can be as follows –

1. The notification is only restricted to ‘practising’ CA/CMA/CS and not those in employment.

2. The notification is restricted to ‘financial transactions’ “in relation to” the activities as specified above. The limitation to ‘financial transactions’ has been widened by the words “in relation to”. Hence wherever there are the specified financial transactions, any activity in relation to these transactions, whether direct or indirect, will be covered.

3. Hence even incase a CA/CMA/CS suggests any buying/selling of investments or properties or creation of a company or opening of a bank account where financial transactions may be done by the client, the sweep of the notification would hold the CA/CMA/CS responsible incase an illegal activity is carried on in relation to these.

4. The coverage of “financial transaction in relation to operation or management of companies” makes the sweep very wide. Hence incase an Income Tax/ GST return is filed by the client but the CA/CMA/CS assists in filing of the same, then the liability of such CA/CMA/CS may arise therein too, incase any activity is detected which deals with proceeds of crime.

5. If there is a transaction involving a client’s use of funds or sourcing of funds, and the transaction is suspicious and may have implications relating to use of the money for money laundering or promotion of terrorism, then a professional, carrying such transaction, cannot contend that he is not aware of the credentials of his client, because he is required to carry due diligence on his client; and it is the duty of the professional to report the same to the authorities. If the PPs have any suspicion about client suspiciously involving in proceeds of crime, then the PPs should dig further in to the transaction. Further the PPs should maintain the record of the due diligence executed for a period of five years from the date of transaction. All practising CA/CMA/CS have already taken note of this notification and thus should consider its impact on their professionals.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles