Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

ISSUING DRC-07 WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF ISSUANCE DRC-01 IS A CLEAR PICTURE OF VIOLATION OF PRINCIPALS OF NATURAL JUSTICE

Rajeev Jain
Issuing DRC-07 Order Five Days After DRC-01 Notice Violates Natural Justice, Lacks Specific Contraventions Under Section 73(1) The Jharkhand High Court ruled that issuing a DRC-07 order within five days of a DRC-01 notice violates principles of natural justice. In the case involving an automobile company and state tax authorities, a vague show cause notice under Section 73(1) was issued without specifying contraventions. The State Tax Officer issued a summary order in FORM GST DRC-07 without allowing a hearing. Rule 142(1)(a) of the JGST Rules requires the detailed show cause notice and its summary to be issued together. The court found the proceedings irregular and unsustainable, quashing the subsequent orders as they violated natural justice principles. (AI Summary)

'JUDGEMENT OF JHARKHAND HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S. CHITRA AUTOMOBILE, VERSUS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAXES, RANCHI, THE STATE TAX OFFICER - 2023 (1) TMI 1131 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT'

A show cause notice under Section 73(1) of the Act dated 12.02.2022  was issued to the petitioner which was issued in a format without striking out the irrelevant particulars and thus, there won’t be an exaggeration in treating the same as vague as it does not spell out the contraventions for which the petitioner is charged.

As a matter of fact, it is worse than the summary of show cause notice issued under FORM GST DRC-01 of the even date. It further transpires that without giving any opportunity of hearing, State Tax Officer finally issued summary of order in FORM GST DRC-07 on 17.02.2022. Its means that he was in so hurry and just within five days from issuance of show cause, he has issued summary of ordwer in FORM GST DRC-07.

Rule 142(1) (a) of the JGST Rules provides that the summary of show cause notice in Form DRC-01 should be issued “along with” the show cause notice under Section 73(1) which will spell out the contraventions in details for which the Assessee is charged. The word “along with” clearly indicates that in a given case show cause notice as well as summary thereof both have to be issued. As per Rule 142(1)(a) of the JGST Rules, the summary of show cause notice has to be issued electronically to keep track of the proceeding initiated against the registered person whereas a show cause notice need not necessarily be issued electronically.

This Court holds that the foundation of the proceeding in the instant case suffers from material irregularity and hence not sustainable being contrary to Section 73 (1) of the JGST Act. Thus, the subsequent proceedings/impugned orders issued under DRC-07 dated 17.02.2022 cannot sanctify the same and liable to be quashed and set aside.

At the cost of repetition, DRC-07 has been issued within five days of issuance of DRC-01 is a clear picture of violation of principles of natural justice.

The impugned show cause notice in the instant case does not fulfill the ingredients of a proper show cause notice and thus amounts to violation of principles of natural justice; the challenge is maintainable in exercise of writ jurisdiction of this Court - Application allowed.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles