Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :

Print Options

+ Post an Article
Post a New Article ✕
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search ❮
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date
PrevPreviousNextNext

Chartered Accountants cannot be held guilty under PMLA merely on the ground of issuance of certificate in favour of accused

Bimal jain
Chartered Accountants Not Liable Under PMLA for Issuing Certificates Like FORM 15-CB, Court Rules The Madras High Court ruled that Chartered Accountants cannot be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, solely for issuing certificates like FORM 15-CB, which are used to support foreign remittances. In this case, the petitioner, a Chartered Accountant, issued certificates for a company later linked to money laundering. The court determined that a Chartered Accountant's role is limited to examining the nature of remittances, not verifying the authenticity of documents provided by clients. Consequently, the court discharged the petitioner from prosecution, finding no involvement in money laundering activities. (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Madras High Court (“the High Court”) in the case of MURALI KRISHNA CHAKRALA VERSUS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, CHENNAI - 2022 (12) TMI 142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT, held that Chartered Accountants (“CA”) is required to only examine the nature of the documents and not genuinity of those documents, therefore, mere issuing certificate cannot be a valid ground to prosecute a CA under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (“the PMLA Act”).

Facts:

Murali Krishna Chakrala (“the Petitioner”) is a practicing CA, who has issued 5 certificates in FORM-15CB under Rule 37-BB of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (“the IT Rules”) in favour of M/s. B.K Electro Tools Products and others, which was subsequently traced as vehicle used for money laundering.

After completion of the investigation, the Enforcement Directorate (“ED”) filed a supplementary complaint in Spl.C.C.No.7 of 2021 by which the Petitioner was arrayed.

Alleging that the Petitioner has travelled beyond the professional scope, ethics and value by issuing FORM  15-CB which were used as a supporting document to make foreign outward remittance.

FORM-15CB issued by a CA, certifies the details of the payment, TDS rate, TDS deduction and other details of nature and purpose of remittance.

The Petitioner approached the High Court in Crl. O.P No. 9047 of 2022 for quashing the prosecution in Spl.C.C.No.7 of 2021 on the ground that FORM 15-CB is not required by law for making overseas payments in relation to imports. However, the said petition was dismissed on April 21,2022

The Petitioner filed a Discharge Petition in Crl.M.P.No. 2684 of 2022 in Spl.C.C.No.7 of 2021 which was dismissed on August 26, 2022. Aggrieved by which the Petitioner filed the present Revision Petition before  the High Court.

Issue:

Whether a CA can be prosecuted under the PMLA Act on the ground that he has issued certificates under IT Rules, 1962 without seeking credibility of the documents relied upon for issuing certificates?

Held:

The High Court held that:

  • The Petitioner was not involved in the money laundering. Further, he has only received fees for certificate services from his client.
  • A CA is required to only examine the nature of the remittance and nothing more. He is not required to go into the genuineness of the documents furnished by his client.
  • The High Court allowed the Revision Petition and discharged the Petitioner from the prosecution.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

Other Topics
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles