Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

CENVAT credit cannot be denied due to invoice issued in the name of head office having with centralised registration

Bimal jain
CENVAT Credit Allowed: Invoices Issued to Centralized Head Office Valid for Credit Availment and Distribution The CESTAT, Chennai ruled that CENVAT credit cannot be denied solely because invoices were issued in the name of a head office with centralized registration. The case involved a manufacturer of steel furniture who availed CENVAT credit on services like commissioning and installation. The Revenue Department had rejected the credit, arguing the invoices were issued to the head office while services were rendered elsewhere. The tribunal referenced a prior decision allowing similar credits and emphasized that centralized registration facilitates credit availment and distribution. Thus, the disallowance of credit lacked legal or factual basis and was set aside. (AI Summary)

The CESTAT, Chennai in M/S. GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF GST & CENTRAL EXCISE CHENNAI NORTH COMMISSIONERATE [2022 (1) TMI 1123 - CESTAT CHENNAI] set aside the order of the Revenue Department rejecting the CENVAT credit of the assessee. Held that, CENVAT credit cannot be denied due to the reason that the invoices were issued in the name of head offices with centralised registration. The purpose of taking centralized registration is to help the manufacturer for availment of credit as well as distribution of credit.

Facts:

M/s. Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. (“the Appellant”) is engaged in the manufacture of steel furniture who availed CENVAT credit on inputs, input services and capital goods.

Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) noticed that, the Appellant availed CENVAT credit on commissioning and installation services which appeared to be ineligible in terms of Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (“the CENVAT Rules”) during the period from November 2015 to October 2016 and May 2017 to June 2017. Accordingly, Show Cause Notices (“SCNs”) and Statements of Demands (“SODs”) were issued to recover the ineligible credit and afterwards demand of recovery with the interest was confirmed with penalties imposed vide Order-in Original (“OIO”) dated June 29, 2018 passed by the Respondent.

Aggrieved by OIO, the Appellant filed before the Commissioner (Appeals), who upheld the decision of the Respondent. Hence, the Appellant has filed this appeal.

The Appellant contended that, the order was confirmed by stating that the invoice is issued in the name of their Head office at Bombay whereas the service of installation and commissioning has been rendered at Ambattur plant in Chennai. There is no such allegation in SCNs / SODs which confirms that credit has been availed on the invoices issued in the name of their Head office situated at Mumbai.

Issue:

Whether CENVAT credit can be rejected merely on the ground that invoices were issued in the name of Head office whereas the services were rendered at a different location?

Held:

The CESTAT, Chennai in M/S. GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF GST & CENTRAL EXCISE CHENNAI NORTH COMMISSIONERATE [2022 (1) TMI 1123 - CESTAT CHENNAI] held as under:

  • Relied on its earlier judgment in Appellant’s own case in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai - 2016 (9) TMI 538 - CESTAT CHENNAI wherein, the Tribunal allowed the Appellant to avail CENVAT credit on input services, such as, commissioning and installation, housekeeping services, air travel services and rent-a-cab services.
  • Observed that, the Respondent ought to have applied the earlier decision of the Tribunal and allowed the credit instead held that the invoice has been issued in the name of the Head office of the appellant company and that services are rendered at Ambattur plant (Chennai).
  • Stated that, there is no law which restricts or prohibits the invoice being issued in the name of the Head office which has Centralized Registration. The purpose of taking centralized registration is to help the manufacturer for availment of credit as well as distribution of credit. Thus, disallowance of credit raising such an issue which is not alleged in SCNs cannot sustain.
  • Set aside the OIO passed by the Respondent.
  • Held that the disallowance of credit is without any legal or factual basis.

Relevant Provisions:

Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules

“Definitions. - In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires, -

“input service” means,-

(i) services provided or agreed to be provided by a person located in non-taxable territory to a person located in non-taxable territory by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India where service tax is paid by the manufacturer or the provider of output service being importer of goods as the person liable for paying service tax for the said taxable services and the said imported goods are his inputs or capital goods; or

(ii) any service used by a provider of output service for providing an output service; or

(iii) any service used by a manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products upto the place of removal,

 and includes services used in relation to modernisation, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage upto the place of removal, procurement of inputs, accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry, security, business exhibition, legal services, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation upto the place of removal; but excludes,-

(A) service portion in the execution of a works contract and construction services including service listed under clause (b) of section 66E of the Finance Act (hereinafter referred as specified services) in so far as they are used for -

  1. construction or execution of works contract of a building or a civil structure or a part thereof; or
  2. laying of foundation or making of structures for support of capital goods,

                    except for the provision of one or more of the specified services; or

 (B) services provided by way of renting of a motor vehicle, in so far as they relate to a motor vehicle which is not a capital goods; or

 (BA) service of general insurance business, servicing, repair and maintenance, in so far as they relate to a motor vehicle which is not a capital goods, except when used by -

  1. a manufacturer of a motor vehicle in respect of a motor vehicle manufactured by such person; or
  2. an insurance company in respect of a motor vehicle insured or reinsured by such person; or

 (C) such as those provided in relation to outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, membership of a club, health and fitness centre, life insurance, health insurance and travel benefits extended to employees on vacation such as Leave or Home Travel Concession, when such services are used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee;”

Explanation.- For the purpose of this clause, sales promotion includes services by way of sale of dutiable goods on commission basis.”

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles