Penalty for concealment of chargeable expenditure: authorities may impose a proportional penalty and require higher approval for large cases. Where the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) is satisfied that a person has concealed particulars of chargeable expenditure or furnished inaccurate particulars, they may direct payment of a penalty, additional to any expenditure-tax, of not less than but up to twice the amount of tax sought to be evaded; if the chargeable expenditure so determined exceeds twenty-five thousand rupees, the Assessing Officer must obtain the previous approval of the Additional Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner before issuing a penalty direction.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalty for concealment of chargeable expenditure: authorities may impose a proportional penalty and require higher approval for large cases.
Where the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals) is satisfied that a person has concealed particulars of chargeable expenditure or furnished inaccurate particulars, they may direct payment of a penalty, additional to any expenditure-tax, of not less than but up to twice the amount of tax sought to be evaded; if the chargeable expenditure so determined exceeds twenty-five thousand rupees, the Assessing Officer must obtain the previous approval of the Additional Commissioner or the Deputy Commissioner before issuing a penalty direction.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.