Limitation on service tax assessments: invalid extended notices treated as standard-limit notices enabling assessment for prescribed prior period. Where an appellate authority, tribunal or court finds that a notice issued under the proviso to section 73(1) is not sustainable because charges of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts or contravention with intent to evade are not established, the Central Excise Officer shall determine the service tax payable for eighteen months as if the notice were issued under sub section (1) for offences subject to the normal eighteen month limitation.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Limitation on service tax assessments: invalid extended notices treated as standard-limit notices enabling assessment for prescribed prior period.
Where an appellate authority, tribunal or court finds that a notice issued under the proviso to section 73(1) is not sustainable because charges of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts or contravention with intent to evade are not established, the Central Excise Officer shall determine the service tax payable for eighteen months as if the notice were issued under sub section (1) for offences subject to the normal eighteen month limitation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.