Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All TMI Notes
of of All TMI Notes
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delhi High Court Penalizes Dubai Firm for Customs Evasion in Confectionery Imports; Upholds Authority u/s 112(a.</h1> The Delhi High Court addressed a case involving an overseas entity from Dubai accused of conspiring with Indian importers to evade customs duty by under-invoicing confectionery imports. The court imposed significant penalties on the appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, amounting to Rs. 13,00,000 and Rs. 23,00,000 for different consignments. The court rejected the appellant's arguments against the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the Customs Act and the applicability of settlements by co-noticees. Additionally, the court dismissed challenges to the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence's authority. The Supreme Court's dismissal of a Special Leave Petition confirmed the High Court's judgment as final.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 