Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the impact of ICDS X containing transitional provisions.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Under ICDS X, whether reversal of an asset and the related income would mean that the entry which wa...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Can any expenditure should set off against a provision recognised for another expendiure.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Expenditure on post-retirement benefits like provident fund, gratuity, etc. are covered by specific ...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the manner of recording the borrowing costs.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What are the activities necessary to prepare inventory for its intended sale as per ICDS IX.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    There are specific provisions in the Act read with Rules under which a portion of borrowing cos...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How to allocate borrowing costs relating to general borrowing as computed in accordance with formula...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Under ICDS IX does borrowing cost include exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowi...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether bill discounting charges and other similar charges would fall under the definition of borrow...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Which are the borrowing costs covered by ICDS IX.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the manner in which securities held as stock-in-trade are required to be valued.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Para 9 of ICDS-VIII on securities requires securities held as stock-in-trade shall be valued at actu...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Which ICDS would govern derivative instruments.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    For subsidy received prior to 1st day of April 2016 but not recognised in the books pending satisfac...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How to deal with a situation where compensation is payable for the purposes of giving ‘immediate f...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether a grant which is not directly relatable to non-depreciable assets should be concluded as an ...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Where the grants are received for assets which are outside the block of assets, then what is the tre...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether grants should be recognised even in cases where there is no certainty that the conditions at...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How are Government grants to be recognized.
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the impact of ICDS X containing transitional provisions.
    Show AI Summary
    Transitional provisions for ICDS X ensure recognition of provisions and contingent items to prevent double taxation or omission.
    Transitional recognition under ICDS X requires that provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets and related income be recognised for previous years commencing on or after 1 April 2016 in accordance with this standard, after taking into account any amount recognised for the same items for previous years ending on or before 31 March 2016; the rule aims to prevent double taxation or omission of income.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Under ICDS X, whether reversal of an asset and the related income would mean that the entry which wa...
    Show AI Summary
    Supremacy of tax law: reversal of an ICDS-recognised asset must follow tax deduction rules, permitting write-off as bad debt.
    Reversal of an asset and related income recognised under ICDS X must conform to the Income-tax Act where conflicts arise; the Act's tax-deduction treatment applies, allowing write-off as a bad debt rather than simply reversing the original accounting recognition entry.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Can any expenditure should set off against a provision recognised for another expendiure.
    Show AI Summary
    Set-off of provisions: expenditures may be set off only against the original provision, not provisions for different purposes.
    Under ICDS X, expenditures must be set off only against the original provision for which they were recognised; expenditures cannot be offset against provisions recognised for a different event or purpose, as that would conceal the separate financial effects of distinct events and undermine transparent disclosure of provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Expenditure on post-retirement benefits like provident fund, gratuity, etc. are covered by specific ...
    Show AI Summary
    Employee post retirement benefit provisioning excluded from ICDS X, governed by specific statutory provisions for income computation.
    Provisioning for employee post retirement benefits covered by AS 15 shall continue to be governed by specific provisions of the Act and are not dealt with by ICDS X; ICDS X does not apply to liabilities otherwise falling within AS 15.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the manner of recording the borrowing costs.
    Show AI Summary
    Borrowing costs capitalization requires capitalizing interest for qualifying assets; inventory only when production is prolonged.
    Borrowing costs directly attributable to acquisition, construction or production of tangible and intangible assets must be capitalized as part of the asset cost. Inventory borrowing costs are capitalized only when the inventory requires an extended period to become saleable. Specific borrowings for a qualifying asset require capitalization of actual borrowing costs incurred during the qualifying period. For general borrowings, a formulaic allocation apportions borrowing costs to qualifying assets based on the ratio of qualifying assets to total assets.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What are the activities necessary to prepare inventory for its intended sale as per ICDS IX.
    Show AI Summary
    Inventory preparation processes define activities included in inventory cost when making goods fit and saleable under accounting standards.
    Activities necessary to prepare inventory for its intended sale include all processes required to make inventory functional for its intended use and to render it saleable, notably quality control to verify fitness for use and primary packing where goods are normally sold in packed condition.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    There are specific provisions in the Act read with Rules under which a portion of borrowing cos...
    Show AI Summary
    Borrowing cost capitalization must exclude portions disallowed by specific statutory provisions, only allowable amounts may be capitalised.
    Borrowing costs capitalised under ICDS IX must exclude amounts disallowed by specific provisions of the Act; only the portion of borrowing cost that remains allowable under the Act may be capitalised, because specific statutory disallowances override ICDS treatment.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How to allocate borrowing costs relating to general borrowing as computed in accordance with formula...
    Show AI Summary
    Capitalization of borrowing costs: general borrowing must be allocated to qualifying assets and capitalized on an asset-by-asset basis.
    General borrowing costs computed under the ICDS-IX formula must be apportioned among qualifying assets and capitalized on an asset-by-asset basis, so that each qualifying asset's capitalized borrowing cost reflects its proportionate share of general borrowing under the standard.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Under ICDS IX does borrowing cost include exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowi...
    Show AI Summary
    Exchange differences excluded from borrowing costs under ICDS IX; foreign exchange effects governed by ICDS VI.
    Exchange differences from foreign currency borrowings that are treated as adjustments to interest are excluded from borrowing costs under ICDS IX; the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates, including those relating to interest, are governed by ICDS VI.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether bill discounting charges and other similar charges would fall under the definition of borrow...
    Show AI Summary
    Borrowing cost: bill discounting and similar charges treated as borrowing cost, except when not tied to borrowed funds.
    The definition of borrowing cost is inclusive and generally covers bill discounting charges and similar charges as borrowing cost for income computation and disclosure; however, discounting charges that do not arise from borrowing funds are excluded from that definition.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Which are the borrowing costs covered by ICDS IX.
    Show AI Summary
    Borrowing costs include interest and related charges such as commitment charges, amortised discount and finance lease charges.
    Borrowing costs under ICDS IX comprise interest and other costs incurred in connection with borrowing funds, including commitment charges, amortised discount or premium, amortised ancillary costs in arranging borrowings, and finance charges for assets taken on finance lease.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the manner in which securities held as stock-in-trade are required to be valued.
    Show AI Summary
    Valuation of securities as stock-in-trade: mandatorily at lower of actual cost and net realizable value.
    Securities held as stock-in-trade must be valued at the lower of actual cost initially recognized and net realizable value at year-end. Unlisted or unquoted securities held as stock-in-trade are to be measured at actual cost as initially recognized, under the income computation and disclosure standards framework.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Para 9 of ICDS-VIII on securities requires securities held as stock-in-trade shall be valued at actu...
    Show AI Summary
    Valuation of securities: aggregate category wise cost compared with net realisable value, lower amount taken as carrying value.
    For subsequent measurement under ICDS VIII, securities held as stock in trade are aggregated category wise; for each category the aggregate cost and aggregate net realisable value are compared, and the lower of the two is taken as the carrying value.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Which ICDS would govern derivative instruments.
    Show AI Summary
    Derivatives accounting: ICDS VI governs typical derivatives, ICDS I applies residually, capital-asset derivatives are excluded.
    ICDS VI supplies guidance for derivative contracts such as forward contracts; derivatives outside ICDS VI's scope fall under ICDS I. Derivative instruments that qualify as capital assets are excluded from ICDS and thus not governed by those standards.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    For subsidy received prior to 1st day of April 2016 but not recognised in the books pending satisfac...
    Show AI Summary
    Recognition of government grants: pre-existing grants deemed recognised on receipt while later grants follow ICDS recognition criteria.
    Grants actually received before the ICDS effective date are deemed recognised on receipt under Para 4(2) of ICDS VII and remain governed by pre-ICDS law; grants received on or after the effective date must be recognised only when the ICDS VII recognition criteria in Paras 5-9 are satisfied, with recognition then following ICDS VII.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How to deal with a situation where compensation is payable for the purposes of giving ‘immediate f...
    Show AI Summary
    Government grant for immediate financial support must be recognised when receivable, irrespective of actual receipt.
    Government grants given as immediate financial support and not tied to specific expenditure must be recognised when the grantee is entitled and sums become receivable; actual receipt is immaterial. If the grant is confined to an individual enterprise and grant-related conditions are met, recognition occurs in the period of receivability, governing timing of income inclusion and disclosure under the income computation framework.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether a grant which is not directly relatable to non-depreciable assets should be concluded as an ...
    Show AI Summary
    Government grants treatment: grants not directly relatable to nondepreciable assets treated as taxable income rather than reduction in asset cost.
    Grants not directly relatable to nondepreciable assets are to be recognised as taxable income under the Act rather than deducted from asset cost; the ICDS preamble confirms the Act prevails over ICDS, and paragraph 7 of ICDS VII applies solely to depreciable assets where reduction of asset cost is appropriate.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Where the grants are received for assets which are outside the block of assets, then what is the tre...
    Show AI Summary
    Recognition of government grants: generally recognized as income on receipt unless reasonable certainty permits spreading with related costs.
    Grants for assets outside the block of depreciable assets are to be recognized as income; statutory tax provisions control and preclude spreading recognition beyond the year of receipt, except where there is reasonable certainty of receipt permitting deferral and matching with costs incurred for obligations related to the non-depreciable assets.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether grants should be recognised even in cases where there is no certainty that the conditions at...
    Show AI Summary
    Recognition of government grants: must occur on receipt; potential reversals are applied against unamortized deferred credit balances.
    ICDS VII requires government grants to be recognised on the date of receipt and prohibits deferral beyond receipt; where grants become refundable because attached conditions are unmet, reversal of initial recognition must first be applied to the unamortized deferred credit arising from the grant, so income recognition must reflect both receipt and the certainty of meeting conditions.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How are Government grants to be recognized.
    Show AI Summary
    Recognition of government grants requires reasonable certainty of compliance and receipt; disclose in income computation accordingly.
    Under ICDS VII, government grants are to be recognized when there is reasonable certainty that the related conditions will be complied with and that the grants will be received; such grants should not be postponed beyond the actual receipt date for income computation and disclosure purposes.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Home› TMI Notes › Income Tax › Case-Laws › Category › This
      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Income Tax

      Interpreting "Technical Services" under Tax Treaties: A Comprehensive Analysis

      20 August, 2024

      Contents
      Rules & Regulations
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      Comprehensive Analysis of the Judgement on Technical Services under Tax Treaty

      Reported as:

      2024 (3) TMI 620 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Introduction

      This article provides a detailed analysis of a recent judgement by the Delhi High Court concerning the interpretation of the term "technical services" under the India-Ireland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The case involved a dispute between the Income Tax Department and Salesforce.com Ireland Limited (SFDC Ireland), a company engaged in the business of providing customer relationship management (CRM) software and related services.

      Arguments Presented

      Assessee's Arguments

      SFDC Ireland contended that the payments received from its Indian subsidiary, SFDC India, were not in the nature of "fees for technical services" under Article 12(3)(b) of the India-Ireland DTAA. The company argued that it was merely selling standard, off-the-shelf, non-customized software products to SFDC India, which acted as a reseller in the Indian territory. The technical assistance and training provided to SFDC India were incidental to the sale of the software products and did not constitute the rendering of technical services.

      Revenue's Arguments

      The Income Tax Department argued that SFDC Ireland was providing comprehensive services and solutions with the help of technology embedded in the software. The department contended that the payments received by SFDC Ireland were in the nature of "fees for technical services" and subject to withholding tax under the DTAA.

      Discussions and Findings of the Court

      Interpretation of "Technical Services"

      The court extensively discussed the interpretation of the term "technical services" under the DTAA and relevant case laws. It referred to the Supreme Court's decision in C.I.T. -4, Mumbai Versus M/s Kotak Securities Ltd. - 2016 (3) TMI 1026 - Supreme Court., which held that the use of a facility does not amount to technical services, as technical services denote services catering to the special needs of the person using them.

      The court also relied on the United Nations Handbook on Selected Issues in Administration of Double Tax Treaties, which provided guidance on the interpretation of "technical services." The Handbook emphasized that technical services must involve the application of specialized knowledge, skill, or expertise by the service provider on behalf of a client or the transfer of such knowledge, skill, or expertise to the client.

      Analysis of the Reseller Agreement

      The court analyzed the terms of the Reseller Agreement between SFDC Ireland and SFDC India. It found that the agreement did not contemplate any technology transfer to SFDC India. SFDC India was merely designated as a reseller to engage with and onboard customers within the territory for the use of SFDC products.

      The technical assistance and training provided by SFDC Ireland were aimed at enabling SFDC India's staff to understand the attributes and capabilities of SFDC products for marketing purposes. The court held that such training and assistance did not constitute the conferral of specialized or exclusive technical services.

      Customization and Individualization

      The court observed that the respondent (Income Tax Department) failed to establish that SFDC Ireland was providing customized or specially designed software solutions to its customers. The impugned order did not advert to any material indicating that the supply of SFDC products departed from a standard scope of services.

      The court emphasized that in order to fall within the ambit of "fees for technical services," it was incumbent upon the respondents to establish an indelible link between the payment received by SFDC Ireland and the consideration for providing customized technical services.

      Analysis and Decision by the Court

      Doctrine of Noscitur a Sociis

      The court applied the principle of noscitur a sociis, which means that words should be interpreted in the context of the words associated with them. The phrase "technical service" was to be read in conjunction with "managerial" and "consultation" services, as mentioned in the DTAA.

      Lack of Evidence for Technical Services

      The court found that the respondents failed to evaluate the claim for withholding tax on the touchstone of whether the remittances made to SFDC Ireland constituted consideration for customized technical services. The impugned order did not proceed based on any material or evidence indicating that the moneys remitted to the assessee could be said to constitute consideration for technical services.

      Remittance Based on Reseller's Net Revenue

      The court noted that the purchase price paid by SFDC India to SFDC Ireland was based on the Reseller's Net Revenue, as per Exhibit A of the Reseller Agreement. The various streams and heads of revenue of SFDC India, including earnings from customization or individualization of the SFDC suite of products, if any, did not appear to have been examined by the respondents.

      Decision

      The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order dated 16 October 2023 and the certification dated 18 October 2023. The matter was remitted to the respondent for considering SFDC Ireland's application afresh, bearing in mind the court's observations, particularly those highlighted in paragraphs 48 and 49 of the judgement.

      Doctrine or Legal Principle Discussed

      The key legal principle discussed in the judgement is the interpretation of the term "technical services" under the India-Ireland DTAA. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Kotak Securities Ltd. and the guidance provided by the United Nations Handbook on Selected Issues in Administration of Double Tax Treaties to establish the criteria for determining whether a service constitutes a "technical service" under the DTAA.

      Comprehensive Summary of the Judgement

      The Delhi High Court, in this judgement, provided a comprehensive analysis of the interpretation of the term "technical services" under the India-Ireland DTAA. The court emphasized that for a service to be considered a "technical service," it must involve the application of specialized knowledge, skill, or expertise by the service provider on behalf of a client or the transfer of such knowledge, skill, or expertise to the client.

      The court analyzed the Reseller Agreement between SFDC Ireland and SFDC India and found that the technical assistance and training provided by SFDC Ireland were aimed at enabling SFDC India's staff to understand the attributes and capabilities of SFDC products for marketing purposes. Such training and assistance did not constitute the conferral of specialized or exclusive technical services.

      The court also noted that the respondents failed to establish that SFDC Ireland was providing customized or specially designed software solutions to its customers. The impugned order did not advert to any material indicating that the supply of SFDC products departed from a standard scope of services.

      Furthermore, the court observed that the respondents did not evaluate the claim for withholding tax on the touchstone of whether the remittances made to SFDC Ireland constituted consideration for customized technical services. The purchase price paid by SFDC India to SFDC Ireland was based on the Reseller's Net Revenue, and the various streams and heads of revenue of SFDC India were not examined.

      Ultimately, the court allowed the writ petition and quashed the order, remitting the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration in light of the court's observations.

       

      Full Text:

      2024 (3) TMI 620 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔