1986 (5) TMI 52

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the asst. yr. 1977-78 was made on 23rd Sept., 1980. In this assessment order the ITO computed the tax payable by the assessee after giving credit to the advance-tax paid in the following manner: I. T. @ 60% Rs. 1,73,186 S.C. @ 5% Rs. 8,659 . Rs. 1,81,845 Less : Advance tax : . Paid on 16-6-1976—Rs. 8600 . Paid on 14-9-1976—Rs. 8,600 . Paid on 14-12-197....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd directed the ITO to treat this amount as advance-tax for the grant of interest under s. 214, in this assessment year as well as in the asst. yr. 1979-80 there was a further claim by the assessee that the interest should be paid up to the date of the refund and not up to the dates of regular assessment as stated by the ITO. 4. It is amply clear from the material on record that in the original....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....manand Bhai Patel and Smt. Jyotsna Devi Patel (1982) 27 CTR (MP) 337 : (1983) 144 ITR 871 (MP). The departmental representative was unable to oppose this contention but contended that the CIT (A) should have restored the original order of the ITO instead of directing the ITO to "treat the payment of Rs. 8,600 on 16th June, 1976 as payment for advance-tax for the purpose of grant of interest under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ays down that interest under s. 214 should be paid upto the date of regular assessment. He contended that there is a conflict between the provisions of sub-ss. (1) and (2) of s. 214 of the Act and as such, the provision of sub-s. (1) thereof should be followed. This contention was opposed by the authorised representative for the assessee who relied on the decisions of Rayons Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. ....