Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1977 (6) TMI 36

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1974-75 the assessee was assessed on total income of Rs. 12,540 and for the asst. yr. 1975-76 he was assessed on a total income of Rs. 23,200. The assessee came up in appeal before the AAC and the first ground of appeal taken up in both the appeals related to the computation of he property income affecting impliedly the total income for both the years. The second ground of appeal convassed in both....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rence was made to the decision of the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court in the case of Daimler Benz A.G. West Germany (1977) CTR (Bom) 568. On the other hand, the Departmental Representative pointed out that the issue was not appealable as the assessee had challenged only the computation of the total income for the years under appeal and had no quarrel with the computation of the advance tax lia....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....are that an assessee can prefer an appeal to the AAC against his regular assessment and urge that all contentions which, if accepted, must result in ITO. holding that there was no liability to pay advance tax and therefore there was no liability to penal interest or even in appeal preferred against an order charging penal interest it would be open to him to raise a contention that the income in re....