Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-----------------------------------------   Item            Stock as            Stock as            Excess / Less                   per Audit           submitted                   Report              to Bank ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tin              64.9 kg             250 kg                + 185.1 kg Finished goods     87 kg            6180 kg            &....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of sanctioned letter. 3. The assessee furnished copy of Fire Insurance Policy of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. which indicated that goods have been insured for Rs. 7,25,000 which is almost equal to stock declared to the bank followed at Rs.7,13,350. The Assessing Officer came to the conclusion that the assessee has shown an excess stock to the bank valued at Rs. 4,35,263 and made the addition accordingly by invoking the provisions of section 69. In support of the impugned addition, the Assessing Officer placed reliance on the following decisions. (1) S. Murugappa Chettiar v. CIT [1988] 174 ITR 245 (Ker.). (2) Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 651 (All.) (3) CIT v. Ashok Textiles (P.) Ltd. [1983] 141 ITR 785 (Ker.) 4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in the appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) proceed to delete the impugned addition with the following observations : On behalf of the appellant it has been stated that they directly needed credit facilities from the Bank in this year for their business; and hence they committed this act. I agree with the view taken by the Assessing Officer, but confirming these two additions would be too heavy ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....higher than the stocks reflected in the stock inventory filed during the assessment proceedings. The discrepancy in the two statements has been worked out by the Assessing Officer at Rs. 4,35,263. The assessee contends that stock hypothecation statement contains inflated quantities and should be disbelieved. However, no evidence whatsoever has been furnished by the assessee before the tax authorities below in support of its contention that quantities of various stocks as reflected in the hypothecation statement are inflated. The preposition of law is unexceptionable that heavy onus lies upon the assessee to prove that the stock hypothecation statement filed before the bank authorities duly signed and authenticated by the partners of the assessee firm is false. The assessee has duly availed of overdraft facilities on the strength of the said statement and the same has been accepted and allowed by the bank authorities. After availing of the benefit of overdraft the assessee cannot be allowed to say that the stock hypothecation statement is a mere falsity. This is particularly so when no evidence whatsoever has been furnished before the tax authorities below like evidence of the bank ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....om the banks. The learned departmental representative has cited a large number of decisions of various High Courts referred above wherein a similar view has been taken as discussed above. Regarding the decision of Madras High Court in the case of CIT v. Shri Padmavathi Cotton Mills [1999] 236 ITR 340 cited by the learned counsel, their Lordships in this decision have referred to their earlier decisions reported in Rama Krishna Mills (Coimbatore) Ltd.'s case and Coimbatore Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd.'s case and took note of the findings of the Tribunal that the assessee has maintained the stock register namely; R.G. register and the stock position reflected in the accounts tallied with the R.G. register. It was in the light of these facts that the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the closing stock declared in the return filed by the assessee based on the R.G. register should be accepted rather than the closing stock as declared to the bank. The facts in the instant case before us are clearly distinguishable inasmuch as no stock register or production register are maintained by the assessee and the stock position as on 31-3-1990, is therefore, not verifiable with reference to any prod....