Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (4) TMI 219

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 42,99,624 contrary to the facts of the case and without considering the fact that the amount deleted is not an admissible item of expenditure." 2. The learned Senior Departmental Representative invited my attention to the statement of facts annexed with the appeal which is reproduced below: ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as assessee's income. On appeal, the learned CIT(A) by his order dt. 8th Jan., 2001 deleted the addition of Rs. 42,99,624 relying on the Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'C' decision dt. 10th June, 1997 in the case of Shree Chalthan Vibhag Khand Udyog Sahkari Mandli Ltd. He has also relied on the CIT(A)'s decision in the case of Khedut Sahkari Khand Udyog Mandli Ltd. for asst. yr. 1994-95. The decisi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gments in the cases reported in CIT vs. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. & Ors. (2000) 163 CTR (Bom) 275 : (2000) 245 ITR 498 (Bom) and CIT vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parishar Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (2002) 174 CTR (Bom) 38 : (2002) 255 ITR 568 (Bom). 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned representatives of the parties and have gone through the judgments cited b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gh Court in the aforesaid judgment has held that the deposits towards area development fund, cane development fund, and hutment fund are not liable to tax as the principle of diversion of income by overriding title would squarely apply in relation to such funds. The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parishar Sahkari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. has held that the funds and ....