2005 (11) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed 19-12-2003. The Commissioner (Appeals), in the impugned order, has upheld the assessees' contention for grant of Modvat credit on OTS cans used in the manufacture of final products. The Revenue had contended that the final product was exempted. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) has noted that when the inputs were received, the final product had not been exempted. He also noted that it had bee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issue was settled in the assessees' favour. The Revenue is aggrieved against this order. 2. The learned SDR relies on the judgment rendered in the case of Albert David Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut - 2003 (151) E.L.T. 443 (Tri. - Del.). In that case, before utilization of inputs, the final product had got exempted. Hence, the Tribunal held that the benefit of credit is not eligible. In the present case, ....