Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2005 (2) TMI 382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J) (Oral)]. - The appellants are manufacturers of Asbestos Cement Corrugated sheets (ACC sheets, for short) falling under SH 6804.00 of the CRTA Schedule. They sell this product from their factory gate as well as from their depots situated in different parts of the country. As the actual price to be sold from the depots is not known at the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re us by learned counsel for the appellants is that the demand of duty raised on them under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act without reviewing the refund order under Section 35EA of the Act is legally not maintainable. It has been pointed out that the SCN for recovery of duty was issued by the original authority which had sanctioned refund of the amount and that such proceedings are void in l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (52) E.L.T. 631 (Tribunal). 2.  Doothat Tea Estate Kanoi Plantation (P) Ltd v. CCE, Shillong, 2001 (135) E.L.T. 386 (Tri.-Kolkata). 3.  Mahabir Industries v. CCE, 2002 (140) E.L.T. 261. 3. Ld. SDR has, on the other hand, submitted that it was open to the department to recover an erroneously refunded amount of duty without recourse to review of the refund order. In this connect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Act for confiscating the containers as also a SCN under Section 28 of the Act for recovery of duty on the imported goods. These notices were contested by the party. When the matter eventually came up before the High Court, the court took the view that no SCN under Section 28 could have been issued until and unless the order under Section 47 had been revised under Section 130. The Supreme Court dis....