Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (10) TMI 215

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....E MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD For the Petitioner : Sri. Joseph Varghese., Advocate For the Respondent : Smt. Malavika Prasad., HCGP ORAL ORDER : The petitioner has called in question the following and these are for the financial year 2020- 2021. Sl. No. Notices/ Orders Date Provisions of KGST Act and Rules, 2017 Annexures 1 Inspection Report 20.10.2022 &nbsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed goods and services relating to maintenance of streetlights for different Government departments and agencies, and the petitioner claims exemption under the Notification No.12/2017 dated 28.06.2017 asserting that the value of the goods supplied is below 25% of the works contract value and therefore it is entitled to exemption. The first respondent has passed the impugned Adjudication Order obser....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat the value of the goods supplied is less than 25% of the works contract value and therefore entitled to exemption. This Court must observe that there is a definite failure in considering the petitioner's Reply to the Show Cause Notice and therefore there must be interference restoring the proceedings for reconsideration. Hence the following: ORDER The petition is allowed-in-part....