Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Binding Dispute Resolution Panel directions invalidate non-conforming assessments, while ad hoc nil pricing of intra-group services fails.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Dispute Resolution Panel directions bind the Assessing Officer when passing the final assessment order. Retaining a transfer-pricing adjustment despite directed relief is not a clerical error capable of rectification where the Transfer Pricing Officer and Assessing Officer consciously adopted the adjustment contrary to those directions; the final assessment order is consequently bad in law. Under the Other Method, arm's length pricing of intra-group technical and shared services requires comparable uncontrolled transactions or a stated basis for the valuation. The Transfer Pricing Officer cannot test commercial benefit and cannot determine a nil arm's length price on an ad hoc basis where evidence of service receipt and cost allocation remains undiscredited. The consequential transfer-pricing addition is deleted.....