2025 (10) TMI 1457

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... MR. RAMESH SINHA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE MR. BIBHU DATTA GURU, JUDGE For the Petitioner : Mr. Shikhar Shukla, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate. Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 1. Heard Mr. Shikhar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State/ respon....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petitioner are that the respondent No. 3-Joint Collector, Balodabazar-Bhatapara issued a show cause notice dated 24.04.2025 to the petitioner wherein a reply was sought from him explaining as to why an externment order against him should not be passed for the District of Balodabazar-Bhatapara, but in the aforementioned show cause notice, certain words such 'goonda' was used without mention....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dian Constitution. The petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 9 of the Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 before the respondent No. 1 and that has been mechanically dismissed on the count of delay, as the appeal was preferred after the lapse of 30 days, therefore the authority did not even enter into the merits of the case and passed the order dated 03.10.3025, which is nothing but highly gross,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....grieved by the order of externment, he was required to prefer the appeal under Section 9 of the Chhattisgarh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (for short, the Act of 1990), against the order of the Collector within a period of 30 days but the appeal was filed belatedly on 12.09.2025 and the same has been dismissed on the ground of delay. 8. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is....