Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (9) TMI 202

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellants against the impugned order vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the order-in-original. 2. I have heard both the sides. The perusal of the record shows that duty demand of Rs. 10,589/- had been confirmed against the appellants under Rule 9(2) read with Section 11A and ordered to be appropriated against the earlier deposit of the differential duty of Rs. 74,369/- whic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e department wanted to classify under sub-heading 8523.19 and that dispute has been finally settled by the decision of the Apex Court. The appellants thereafter accepted the classification suggested by the department. Therefore, no penalty deserves to be imposed in view of the Apex Court judgment in the case of Northern Plastics Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, 1998 (101) E.L.T. 549 (S.C.) = 1998 ....