2014 (12) TMI 1447
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Opponent(s) No. 1 : Mr. Km Parikh, Advocate. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) 1. By way of this appeal, the assessee has challenged the judgment and order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad in ITA No. 1709/Ahd/2001 for AY 1992-93. 2. While admitting this appeal on 23.11.2007, this Court has framed the following substantial question of law: ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as challenged the said assessment order before the CIT(A) which was partly allowed. Against the order of CIT(A), the Revenue has preferred an appeal before the ITAT which was partly allowed. Being aggrieved by the order of ITAT, the assessee company has preferred the present Tax Appeal before this Court. 4. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the parties and considered the submissions. Th....
TaxTMI