Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (7) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sub-heading 2302.00 and holding that the declared value of the whole product forms basis of payment of duty, rejecting the appellant's contention that they were entitled to reduce the assessable value by 50% as the potency level of active mass of the product in the total dry mass varied by 50%. 2. We have heard both sides. 3. The undisputed process of manufacture of the product is as follows :- "Broth is obtained by a fermentation process using various inputs such as soya bean meal, soya bean oil, glucose, calcium hydroxide, yeast; the fermented broth is subjected to treatment with alkali and acid; the treated broth is filtered on rotary vacuum filter; the Wet Salinomycin Mycelium obtained from the rotary vacuum filter is dried; the filt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n are not separated, but dried along with the medium culture and then powdered and supplied to job-workers for further manufacture of Coxistac which is a pre-mix. The appellants do not dispute that the product is used in the further manufacture of the pre-mix Coxistac. Although, the appellants urged that the goods in dispute are not the products of anti-biotic manufacturing process, this plea is not supported by any evidence. The product is not coccidiostat and carrier as claimed by the appellant but coccidiostat alone (dried along with medium culture) and therefore, not identical to the products covered by the Larger Bench decision in the case of Tetragon Chemie, [2001 (138) E.L.T. 414 (Tri. - LB) = 1999 (30) RLT 366] and Li-Taka Pharmaceu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....content of 35% and therefore is excluded from Chapter 23 of the Schedule to the CETA 95. 6. In the light of the above discussion, we hold that the product in dispute falls for classification under CET sub-heading 2941.90 as antibiotic. 7. Now we come to valuation of goods. The declared assessable value pertaining to relevant periods submitted vide cost data shows the cost of product on per Kg basis and the said declared value formed the basis for payment of duty on the quantities of finished product cleared. The appellants, however, determined and paid the duty multiplying the assessable value with only the active mass and not the total mass of the finished goods on the ground that the potency level of the active mass of the product in th....