2026 (7) TMI 1739
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioner and learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner herein has approached this Court, challenging a summary of the order of assessment, passed by the 1st respondent, on 12.09.2023, on the ground that the said order does not contain a signature of the assessing officer. 3. The effect of the absence of the signature, on an assessment order was earlier considered by this Court, in the case of A.V. Bhanoji Row Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), in W.P.No.2830 of 2023, decided on 14.02.2023. A Division Bench of this Court, had held that the signature, on the assessment order, cannot be dispensed with and that the provisions of Sections-160 & 169 of the Central Goods and Service Tax....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../s. Bambino Agro Industries Ltd. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, in Writ Tax No.2707 of 2025, had held that uploading the order in the portal, mentioned by the GST Authorities, would not be sufficient service of the order on the registered person. This Court has taken a contrary view in W.P.No.5397 of 2026. 9. However, the fact remains that a very large number of registered persons have approached this Court with the contention that they were unable to access the portal either on account of their ignorance or on account of the fact that the persons, authorized by them, to act on their behalf, are not informing them of such order. In the normal course, this Court would not accept such a contention as neither ignorance of law nor t....
TaxTMI