2026 (6) TMI 384
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Jai Prakash For the Respondent(s) : Dhananjay Awasthi, G.A. ORDER 1. Heard Sri Hemendra Pratap Singh and Sri Jai Prakash, learned counsel for petitioner; Sri Dhananjay Awasthi and Sri Lakshya Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no.1; learned A.G.A for State-respondent nos. 2 & 3 and perused the material taken on record. 2. The present petition has been filed praying for following re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is proprietor of a company incorporated in the name and style of M/s. Jaina Trading Company. Investigation regarding the affairs of the company for violation of provisions of GST Act, were going on. He was summoned by the Department of GST 28.07.2021 which he challenged before the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hat no place of arrest of the petitioner was mentioned in the arrest memo. He was produced before the Remand Magistrate/ACJM Court No.7, Meerut, on 10.01.2026 and was remanded to the judicial custody for 14 days on the same day. No "grounds of arrest" and "reasons to believe" were supplied to the petitioner. The arrest of the petitioner is in violation of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d it was part of the arrest memo. It has further been submitted that there is acknowledgement of the petitioner on the arrest memo that he has been furnished "grounds of arrest" in writing. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has rejoined and pointed out that the signature of the petitioner was taken on the "arrest memo" after making him state that he has received the "grounds of arrest" in w....
TaxTMI