Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (5) TMI 1493

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent : Sri. Chandra Shekara K, Advocate ORAL ORDER: The petitioner is before this Court in this Criminal revision petition filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.PC with a prayer to set aside the order dated 01.10.2019 passed by the Special Court for Economic Offences, Bengaluru in C.C.No.77/2018, discharging the respondent/accused for the offence punishable under Sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion petition has been allowed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 03.02.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that accused No.2 is the Managing Director of the Company and the petitioner is only a Director along with the accused Nos.3 to 5. Petitioner was not participating in the day to day affairs of management of the Company and therefore he cannot be vicariously held liab....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cused Nos.2 to 6 were in charge of day-to-day affairs of accused No.1 Company. The said finding recorded by the Trial Court is common to accused Nos.2 to 6. The Co-ordinate Branch of this Court has set aside the said finding in Crl.RP.No.396/2020 which was filed by the petitioner as against accused No.2. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that even this Criminal revision petition needs t....