2002 (10) TMI 200

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. This order will dispose of the above captioned two appeals filed by the appellants - Appeal No. E/2223/2002-NB(S) has been filed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 24-5-2002, while Appeal No. E/2224/2002-NB(S) has been filed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 20-5-2002. 3. In Appeal No. E/2223/2002-NB(S) the issue relates to the availability of Modvat credit of Rs. 7,799/- in respect of pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... order of the learned Commissioner. 6. I have perused the record and the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and also the order-in-original of the Asstt. Commissioner. The personal computer in my view does not in any manner fall within the definition of the 'Capital Goods' as given in Rule 57Q itself. In this case, it is a computer which is being used by the appellants for their person....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d order of the Commissioner (Appeals) being perfectly valid, is upheld. 8. In Appeal No. E/2224/2002-NB(S), the issue relates to the entitlement of Modvat credit to the appellants in respect of Lighting Arrestor used for protecting the transformer against damage due to lighting. The Modvat amount claimed by the appellants for this item is Rs. 5,367/-. The adjudicating authority allowed the Modv....