2026 (4) TMI 953

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CHNICAL) For the Appellants : Mr. Perikal K Arjun, Advocate For the Respondents : No Appearance JUDGMENT Per: Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial): The instant Company Appeal arises from the impugned order dated 20.04.2021, passed by the NCLT, Bangalore Bench, in CP No. 99/BB/2017. This Company Appeal is accompanied by IA No. 257/2025, wherein the Appellant has sought condonation of a delay of 471 days in refiling the Appeal. 2. Learned Counsel for the Appellant was heard on IA No. 257/2025, wherein condonation of a delay of 471 days in refiling the Appeal has been sought. Before venturing into the contents of the Application, certain relevant dates are required to be considered: a. The impugned order wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l (which is 04.01.2022) till its final re-filing on 07.02.2025, there have been significant delays in refiling of the Company Appeal in three different spells, as detailed below: a) From 18.01.2022 to 02.02.2022 - 8 days. b) From 08.02.2022 to 04.01.2023 - 354 days. c) From 07.01.2025 to 07.02.2025 - 24 days. 6. The Appellants have filed two Interlocutory Applications, namely (i) IA No. 258/2025, seeking impleadment of the legal heirs of Appellant No. 1 & 2 and (ii) IA No. 257/2025, seeking condonation of delay in refiling. 7. In the Application seeking condonation of delay in refiling, the Appellants are Shareholders in the Respondent No. 1 Company, which is engaged in the business of manu....