2026 (4) TMI 595
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s. Ayantika Bhattacharyya. For the State: Mr. Pretom Das. Ms. Kanika Saha Sarkar. 1. The matter pertains to, in effect, challenge to an order of cancellation of registration under the provisions of WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) dated 26th March, 2025. 2. Although the learned advocate for the respondent has placed before this Court a Public Notice dated 23r....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ctive and works against the interest of the revenue since, the petitioner in such a case would not able to carry on his business in the sense that no invoice can be raised by the petitioner and ultimately would impact recovery of tax, I am of the view that the respondents should take a pragmatic view in the matter and permit the petitioner to carry on his business. 5. Accordingly, having regard....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ever, if the petitioner fails to comply with the directions as aforesaid, the benefit of this order will not enure to the petitioner and the writ petition would stand automatically dismissed. 7. For the purpose of compliance of the above directions, the respondents are directed to activate the portal within one week from the date of communication of this order, so that the petitioner can file h....
TaxTMI