TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Search is not Issue with Search Functionality Showing Irrelevant Result
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....earch is not Issue with Search Functionality Showing Irrelevant Result <br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Dhruva Dated:- 7-4-2026 Goods and Services Tax - GST <br> Got 2 Replies <br> GST<br> <br> I am not getting relevant results while searching on the D forum or Advance search button. I am trying to find discussions on specific legal discussions, answers questions, such as why a notice cannot be is....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sued merely due to a difference between turnover reported in GSTR-8 (TCS return) and GSTR-3B. However, when I search using keywords like "section 52", "TCS", and "GSTR-3B", the results are not focused. The system is showing all results containing any of these words separately, instead of combining them to give relevant discussions on the exact issue. Ideally, the search should understand the full ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....context and show results where all these concepts are connected, rather than displaying unrelated content with just one matching keyword. --Reply By: Shilpi Jain The Reply: How about the Ai search facility? --Reply By: YAGAY andSUN The Reply: Subject: Limitation in Advanced Search Functionality - Lack of Contextual Result Filtering * Issue Observed While using the "D Forum" and the "Advanc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed Search" feature, it has been observed that search results are not aligned with the intended legal query. Specifically, searches using multiple keywords such as "Section 52", "TCS", and "GSTR-3B" yield results containing any one of these terms independently, rather than providing discussions where all terms are contextually linked. * Nature of Limitation The current search mechanism appears to....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... rely on isolated keyword indexing instead of applying Boolean logic (e.g., AND conditions) or contextual relevance. As a result, the output includes broadly matched content rather than focused discussions addressing the specific legal issue-such as the validity of issuing notices solely on the basis of discrepancies between GSTR-8 and GSTR-3B. * Impact on Legal Research This limitation signific....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....antly affects the efficiency and accuracy of legal research. Users seeking precise interpretational discussions or precedent-based clarifications are required to manually filter through large volumes of unrelated content, leading to increased time and effort. * Expected Functionality Ideally, the search tool should: * Support Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to refine queries; * Recognize phra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se-based searches (e.g., "Section 52 TCS mismatch with GSTR-3B"); * Deliver results based on contextual relevance rather than standalone keyword presence; * Prioritize discussions where all queried concepts are substantively addressed together. * Suggested Workarounds Until such enhancements are implemented, the following approaches may improve results: * Use quotation marks for exact phrases....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (if supported); * Reduce the number of keywords and search iteratively; * Include more specific phrases such as "GSTR-8 vs GSTR-3B notice validity"; * Filter results manually by category or date, where available. Conclusion The current search limitations hinder targeted legal research. Implementation of context-aware and Boolean-based search capabilities would significantly improve usability a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd result accuracy for professional users. <br>***<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing....