Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2001 (4) TMI 150

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....- The duty demand in the present appeal consists of two parts. Demand of about Rs. 35 lakhs is in respect of certain goods bought by the appellants from the market and supplied to the project. Remaining demand of about Rs. 12 lakhs is in respect of notional interest on advances. 2. When the matter was taken up for arguments today, learned Representative of the appellants submitted that M/s. BHEL ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the appellants factory. learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that there could be no duty demand in respect of the items procured from the market and supplied directly by the appellants to the Plant Power, inasmuch as they had not undertaken any manufacturing activity in respect of those bought out items. Nor had they used the bought out goods in the manufacture of any new products. With reg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant vide Tribunal's Final Order No. 932-949/2000-A in Appeal Nos. E/578-595/2000-A in appellants own case. 3. As against the aforesaid submission on behalf of the appellants learned Departmental Representative submitted that the demand in the present case is justified inasmuch as the bought out items constituted identifiable parts of electricity generator machinery and that the payment for the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a reduced price, in consideration of advance payment. In fact, all the supplies in the present case were in terms of a contract for about Rs. 28 crores. Out of the above, only part of the goods were manufactured by the appellant. Terms of payment had stipulated percentages of payment due at various stages of the contract. In these circumstances allegation cannot be made that goods supplied were a....